2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10696-018-9305-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of shift and break flexibility with real-time break assignments using a rolling horizon approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second phase then iteratively schedules breaks for each shift. Hur et al (2019) propose five different integer programming models for shift selection and staffing in which breaks may be scheduled in real-time while minimizing understaffing or maximizing the number of breaks which may be assigned. Additionally, a rolling horizon approach is proposed designed to accommodate short-term demand forecasts in order to efficiently manage fluctuations in demand.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second phase then iteratively schedules breaks for each shift. Hur et al (2019) propose five different integer programming models for shift selection and staffing in which breaks may be scheduled in real-time while minimizing understaffing or maximizing the number of breaks which may be assigned. Additionally, a rolling horizon approach is proposed designed to accommodate short-term demand forecasts in order to efficiently manage fluctuations in demand.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scheduling of meal and rest breaks is not often tackled in the airline crew scheduling literature. Recently, Hur et al [15], [16] investigate a daily shift scheduling problem with flexible breaks under stochastic demand that allows for break adjustments on the day of operation. Kiermaier et al [17] studies the problem of assigning multiple breaks to shifts in the context of large-scale tour scheduling.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where [Z − η] + := max{0, Z − η},α ∈ (0, 1]. With the term ([Z − η] + ) in the linearization formulation (16) and the assumption that the probability distribution space is discrete finite, the conditional value-at-risk of the random variable Z at the confidence level α can be rewritten as:…”
Section: B Risk-averse Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%