2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.09.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation into the kinetic (sliding) friction of some tablets and capsules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further to the geometrical dimensions of tablets and the pan, other properties of the tablet and pan used as part of the simulation are listed in Table 1. The interaction parameters, especially the coefficient of friction, vary with the material type as reported by previous experimental studies (Hancock et al, 2010;Suzzi et al, 2012). Hancock et al (2010) suggested that the tablet-polymer/steel friction coefficient varies from 0.0 to 0.74 according to the material and surface properties while Suzzi et al (2012) showed that the coefficient of restitution between tablets and marble plate is 0.74 with a standard deviation of 0.03.…”
Section: Numerical Model Of In-line Measurementmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Further to the geometrical dimensions of tablets and the pan, other properties of the tablet and pan used as part of the simulation are listed in Table 1. The interaction parameters, especially the coefficient of friction, vary with the material type as reported by previous experimental studies (Hancock et al, 2010;Suzzi et al, 2012). Hancock et al (2010) suggested that the tablet-polymer/steel friction coefficient varies from 0.0 to 0.74 according to the material and surface properties while Suzzi et al (2012) showed that the coefficient of restitution between tablets and marble plate is 0.74 with a standard deviation of 0.03.…”
Section: Numerical Model Of In-line Measurementmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The interaction parameters, especially the coefficient of friction, vary with the material type, as reported by previous experimental studies (Hancock et al, 2010;Suzzi et al, 2012). Hancock et al (2010) suggested that the tablet-polymer/steel friction coefficient varies from 0.0 to 0.74 according to the material and surface properties. Suzzi et al (2012) showed that the coefficient of restitution between tablets and a marble plate is 0.74±0.03.…”
Section: Biconvex Flat Elliptic Starmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The DEM simulation is implemented in LIGGGHTS 3.1.0 (Kloss et al, 2012) with classical contact mechanics -Hertz theory for the normal contacts (Johnson, 1985) and Mindlin theory for the tangential contacts (Mindlin, 1949). The interaction parameters, especially the coefficient of friction, vary with the material type, as reported by previous experimental studies (Hancock et al, 2010;Suzzi et al, 2012). Hancock et al (2010) suggested that the tablet-polymer/steel friction coefficient varies from 0.0 to 0.74 according to the material and surface properties.…”
Section: Biconvex Flat Elliptic Starmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In applications in protective coatings, a high hardness and mar resistance are of great importance. In applications as coatings on objects, such as drug tablets (Hancock et al, 2010) or seeds (Steffen et al, 1999), friction and tack adhesion should be low to ensure ease of production and handling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%