1967
DOI: 10.1190/1.1439906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Inverse Slope Method of Determining Absolute Resistivity

Abstract: In conventional interpretation of electrical resistivity data, either one uses an empirical method (Moore, 1945) or an analytical method (Tagg, 1934; Roman, 1934; or Mooney and Wetzel, 1956). While the Tagg, Roman, and Mooney and Wetzel systems are based on theoretical considerations, they are tedious and time‐consuming. The Moore method, while it is very rapid, has the disadvantage of not yielding absolute values of resistivity. Sarma (1963) suggested a modification of the Moore method using Hummel’s (1931) p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is widely practiced for the estimation of various parameter layers in 1D resistivity surveys (Narayan and Ramanujachary, 1967). Using the ISM, the field Schlumberger data are plotted on a simple linear graph paper for generating of a straight line segment by joining various points.…”
Section: Inverse Slope Methods (Ism)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is widely practiced for the estimation of various parameter layers in 1D resistivity surveys (Narayan and Ramanujachary, 1967). Using the ISM, the field Schlumberger data are plotted on a simple linear graph paper for generating of a straight line segment by joining various points.…”
Section: Inverse Slope Methods (Ism)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wenner method (Wenner 1969) It is based on equal distance spacing 4 probe methods which is carried out by inverse slope method suggested by Narayan and Ramanujachary (1967). The objective of VES is to record the changes in resistivity with depth and to correlate it with the available geological information to infer the depths and resistivity of the layers present.…”
Section: Methodology Exploration Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the meantime, Narayan and Ramanujachary (1967) showed that it is possible to solve the field equation directly to get resistivity and thicknesses of the subsurface layers from the field data by inverse slope method (Narayan and Ramanujachary 1967). The inverse slope vertical electrical resistivity (VES) method as suggested by these two authors works very well in engineering geology and also in groundwater exploration for 2-5 layered.…”
Section: Methodology Exploration Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By this means, the resistivity and depth to the third layer may be determined. According to [4] the thickness and resistivities of the second, third and fourth layers determined from the ρ 2 ∕ ρ 1 , ρ 3 ∕ρ 1 , ρ 4 ∕ ρ 1 and h 2 ∕ h 1 , h 3 ∕ h 1 and h 4 /h 1 ratios were given on the type curves. In the present study, the analytical method was carried out using a computer program RESIST 87 developed by [5].…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%