An Introduction to the NMFS Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey with an Emphasis on Economic Valuation

Hicks, Robert L.; Gautam, Amy B.; Voorhees, David Van; Osborn, Maury F.; Gentner, Brad

doi:10.1086/mre.14.4.42629280

Cited by 15 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The first estimation procedure is naïve and does not correct for endogenous stratification or size-biased sampling; this unweighted estimator assumes the intercept data are collected at random, as have many papers that have used MRFSS data for estimation of site choice models [25,44]. 16 The second estimation procedure utilizes a variation of Cosslett's [6] weight within WESMLE. This procedure, which we will call the basic WESMLE, assumes that the sample is a pure choice-based sample, implying that observations within each site are selected at random.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Addressing onsite sampling in recreation site choice models

Hindsley

Landry

Gentner

2011

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These improvements are then averaged across all the trees generated within the GBM process, up until the predetermined stopping point. As stated earlier, we utilize the mean absolute effect size to determine the optimal 16 Hicks et al [16] identify eleven peer-reviewed papers estimating recreation site choice models with the MRFSS before 1999.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Addressing onsite sampling in recreation site choice models

Hindsley

Landry

Gentner

2011

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Table 2 provides the years that surveys were conducted by region. 2002, 2004, 2006, 2011 2002, 2007, 2011 Atlantic Highly Migratory Species 1996, 1997, 1999, 2006, 2009, 2011, 2009Pacific Islands 2006, 20112006Southeast 1999, 2006, 2009, 2011, 2009West Coast 1998, 2001, 2006, 2009 The regular collection of economic data to coincide with MRFSS/MRIP data led to an expansion in the application of RUM models and resulted in region specific studies on the value of access to recreational fishing, as well as estimates on values related to changing catch rates (Hicks et al 2000). Examples include New England and the mid-Atlantic (Hicks et al 1999) and the southeast (Haab et al 2000).…”

Section: Research On Recreational Fishing Was Facilitated By the Implmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Evolution of Non-Market Valuation of U.S. Coastal and Marine Resources

Lipton

Lew²,

Wallmo³

et al. 2015

Journal of Ocean and Coastal Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The findings and conclusions of this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. AbstractAt the federal level, particularly within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), regulatory and programmatic needs have driven the continued development and application of non-market valuation approaches to marine and coastal resources. The evolution of these valuation approaches not only entails adopting the recommendations of the 1993 NOAA blue ribbon panel on contingent valuation, but also an expansion of stated preference approaches with increased use of stated preference choice experiments. Revealed preference approaches have also advanced with more sophisticated random utility models. We provide an overview of this evolution in the areas of natural resources damage assessment, protected resources, recreational fisheries, and coastal management. With the broad adoption of an ecosystem services approach to marine and coastal resource management, the demand for valuation of ecosystem services has grown and will continue to provide the impetus for more studies similar to those presented. Similar to what occurred initially as a result of the blue ribbon study, greater adoption of valuation estimates, particularly for non-use value, may be facilitated by guidance and standards from a high-level or highly respected authority. La evolución de la valoración no basada en el mercado de recursos marinos y costeros de Estados UnidosLea el abstracto en español 请点击此处阅读中文摘要请点击此处阅读中文摘要

show abstract

“…These data are collected using two complementary surveys (for details, see Hicks et al 1999). The first is a Coastal Household Telephone Survey used to estimate the total number of fishing trips made by coastal residents (who also happen to own a telephone).…”

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the second survey, an accesspoint angler intercept survey is conducted at randomly chosen public marine fishing access points, where angler demographics, catch and species composition are collected by trained personnel. The two surveys combined are expected to provide an accurate estimate of total fishing effort including non-coastal anglers and coastal anglers without a telephone (Hicks et al 1999).…”

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy of harvest and minimum size limit regulations for controlling short‐term harvest in recreational fisheries

Poorten

Cox

Cooper

2012

Fisheries Management Eco

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is important to consider the potential effectiveness of regulations for reducing total harvest levels when developing fishery management plans. A random forest (RF) modelling approach was used to examine how changing per‐angler harvest or minimum size limit regulations affected sport fishery harvest in US Atlantic coast recreational fisheries. Harvest limits per angler (i.e. bag limits) were typically high initially and subsequently reduced, whereas almost half of minimum length limits were initially below the length‐at‐maturity and subsequently increased. Across most fisheries examined, extreme reductions in harvest limits (e.g. from unlimited to catch‐and‐release) were largely ineffective at limiting total fishery harvest. Increasingly restrictive minimum length limits caused a greater average harvest reduction than per‐angler harvest limits. Some regulation changes were associated with higher angling effort and thus increased harvest, which suggests that when effort cannot be constrained, more direct harvest limitations should be considered.

show abstract

An Introduction to the NMFS Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey with an Emphasis on Economic Valuation

Cited by 15 publications

References 14 publications

Addressing onsite sampling in recreation site choice models

Addressing onsite sampling in recreation site choice models

The Evolution of Non-Market Valuation of U.S. Coastal and Marine Resources

Efficacy of harvest and minimum size limit regulations for controlling short‐term harvest in recreational fisheries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About