1995
DOI: 10.1016/1350-4533(95)91881-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intramedullary aligned bone cutting jig for elbow replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 5% of humans undergoing TEA, fracture of the olecranon has been reported as a major complication 16 . Bone cuts that are perpendicular to each other, creating a stress riser in the ulna, have been identified as a predisposing factor for an olecranon fracture 17 . In one study, comparing different ulnar ostectomies, the ulna retained a higher strength if it was prepared with a rounded rather than a 90° cut 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 5% of humans undergoing TEA, fracture of the olecranon has been reported as a major complication 16 . Bone cuts that are perpendicular to each other, creating a stress riser in the ulna, have been identified as a predisposing factor for an olecranon fracture 17 . In one study, comparing different ulnar ostectomies, the ulna retained a higher strength if it was prepared with a rounded rather than a 90° cut 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macdonald et al (2004) and Kludge (2007) indicate that the success of knee replacement surgery depends on two critical factors: bone cutting alignment and implant position on the cutting plane. Zafiropoulos and Attfield (1995) and Haaker et al (2005) reported that cutting accuracy can be improved significantly by using a cutting jig rather than solely using bare hands. Researchers have argued that errors can occur despite correct positioning of the jig because of vibration and instability during the cutting procedure or variations in individual anatomy (Macdonald et al, 2004;Kendoff et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%