2022
DOI: 10.1002/admt.202101690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Internet‐of‐Disease System for COVID‐19 Testing Using Saliva by an AI‐Controlled Microfluidic ELISA Device

Abstract: Throughout coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) outbreaks, the centers for disease control and prevention (CDCP) of a country require monitoring of particular territories to provide public health guidance. In this work, the Internet of Diseases (IoD) is suggested for continuous real‐time monitoring of infectious diseases for public health. Because converging information and communication technologies (ICTs) with point‐of‐care (POC) devices to enable the IoD for continuous real‐time health monitoring and processing o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the minimum differentiable signal (average signal of the blank sample plus three times standard deviation), the resulting photothermal limit of detection (LOD) was 0.096 ng mL −1 (Table S2 †), which was 20-fold lower than the visual observation. The sensitivity of this method is superior to LFIA-colorimetry 40,41 and LFIA-uorescence, 42 and comparable to LFIA-Raman, 43 microuidic ELISA 44 and multiplexed immunoassay 45 (Table S4 †). More importantly, the method could be completed in 20 minutes, without expensive and large instruments, and could be applied for real-time and accurate screening of SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Papermentioning
confidence: 90%
“…According to the minimum differentiable signal (average signal of the blank sample plus three times standard deviation), the resulting photothermal limit of detection (LOD) was 0.096 ng mL −1 (Table S2 †), which was 20-fold lower than the visual observation. The sensitivity of this method is superior to LFIA-colorimetry 40,41 and LFIA-uorescence, 42 and comparable to LFIA-Raman, 43 microuidic ELISA 44 and multiplexed immunoassay 45 (Table S4 †). More importantly, the method could be completed in 20 minutes, without expensive and large instruments, and could be applied for real-time and accurate screening of SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Papermentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Microfluidics was quickly adapted to develop quick turnaround of immunological as well as molecular antigen tests for rapid identification and diagnosis of exposed citizens and patients [158][159][160] for subsequent quarantine to curb the spread of the infectious disease. For example, Bhuiyan et al developed an AI-controlled programmable microfluidic platform to perform ELISA immunoassays for cardiovascular disease diagnosis and SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis [161,162]. Many microfluidic POCT sensing platforms are also integrated with AI for analysis.…”
Section: Disease Diagnosis and Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%