1996
DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(96)00036-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An international study on measuring social support: Interactions and satisfaction

Abstract: Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Doeglas, D. M., Suurmeijer, T. P. B. M., Briancon, S., Krol, B., Moum, T., Sanderman, R., ... van den Heuvel, W. J. A. (1996). An international study on measuring social support: Interactions and satisfaction. Social Science & Medicine, 43(9), 1389-1397. CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
54
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(27 reference statements)
7
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater the discrepancy between the amount of supportive transactions received and a person's need for these transactions, the less the patients' needs are fulfilled and, consequently, the less they will feel satisfied with the social support received and the more their mental health or wellbeing will be jeopardized (Van Sonderen, 1991). This was confirmed in our study on measuring social support satisfaction among ERA patients (Doeglas et al, 1996;Doeglas et al, 2004). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The greater the discrepancy between the amount of supportive transactions received and a person's need for these transactions, the less the patients' needs are fulfilled and, consequently, the less they will feel satisfied with the social support received and the more their mental health or wellbeing will be jeopardized (Van Sonderen, 1991). This was confirmed in our study on measuring social support satisfaction among ERA patients (Doeglas et al, 1996;Doeglas et al, 2004). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Note that, in fact, Thoits' definition of social support (see above) explicitly refers to need satisfaction. Some empirical support for this point of view was found in one of our earlier studies in which satisfaction with supportive transactions appeared to be more relevant for the patients' wellbeing than these transactions as such (Doeglas et al, 1996). The amount of supportive transactions does not necessarily reflect the need for social support of the RA-patients while satisfaction/dissatisfaction does.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eisenberger et al, 1986), it may affect the decision-making of teachers' emotional regulation strategies. Whereas actual supportive interactions are objective in nature, the perception of being supported relies on the sensitivity of the individual involved, which is subjective in terms of quality (Doeglas et al, 1996). Eisenberger et al (1986) point out that POS would be impacted upon by different parts of employee's treatment by the organization and would, in turn, determine the employee's interpretation of organizational intentions behind such treatment.…”
Section: Perceived Organizational Support (Pos) As a Moderatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have established that satisfaction with social support is an important factor to consider because subjective appraisal of the quality of social support received can also impact well-being in both positive and negative ways (e.g. over protectiveness leading to greater dependency) [22,23]. Thus, we also incorporate satisfaction with social support as an independent predictor, to establish whether frequency or quality of social contacts have a differential effect on wellbeing in older breast cancer survivors.…”
Section: The Stress-coping Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%