2015
DOI: 10.3808/jei.201500310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Intercomparison of Sampling Methods for Uncertainty Quantification of Environmental Dynamic Models

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) of environmental dynamic models requires an efficient way to extract the information about the relationship between input parameter and model output. A uniformly scattered sample set is generally preferred over crude Monte Carlo sampling for its ability to explore the parameter space more effectively and efficiently. This paper compares eight commonly used uniform sampling methods along with the crude Monte Carlo sampling. The efficiency is measured by six uniformity m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that MC-based sampling strategies can be computationally expensive and sometimes unaffordable for computationally demanding models, other sampling strategies have been developed and improved over the last several decades. Of these, Latin hypercube sampling (LHS;McKay et al, 1979) has been most commonly used for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the field of water and environmental modelling (Hossain et al, 2006;Gong et al, 2015;Higdon et al, 2013;Sheikholeslami and Razavi, 2017). The LHS approach offers a sampling strategy that can significantly reduce the sample size without compromising the accuracy of uncertainty estimation compared to the MC sampling approach (Iman and Conover, 1980;Iman and Helton, 1988;McKay et al, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that MC-based sampling strategies can be computationally expensive and sometimes unaffordable for computationally demanding models, other sampling strategies have been developed and improved over the last several decades. Of these, Latin hypercube sampling (LHS;McKay et al, 1979) has been most commonly used for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the field of water and environmental modelling (Hossain et al, 2006;Gong et al, 2015;Higdon et al, 2013;Sheikholeslami and Razavi, 2017). The LHS approach offers a sampling strategy that can significantly reduce the sample size without compromising the accuracy of uncertainty estimation compared to the MC sampling approach (Iman and Conover, 1980;Iman and Helton, 1988;McKay et al, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous studies Gan et al 2014;Gong and Duan 2017;Gong et al 2015;Gong et al 2016a;Gong et al 2016b), an uncertainty quantification (UQ) framework was developed to quantify the uncertainty of large, complex dynamic system models, such as land-surface, weather, and climate models, which include many physical processes and cost a substantial amount of computational resources to run. The uncertainty quantification framework includes the following steps: (1) using parameter screening to reduce the number of adjustable parameters, (2) building a surrogate model to emulate the response surfaces of the original model to the variation in the adjustable parameters, and (3) running the surrogate model with the sensitive parameters to optimize the original model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to oil spill simulation, optimization is also desired to provide decision support under changing environmental conditions (Huang et al, 1996;Huang and Cao, 2011;Gong et al, 2016). Zhong and You (2011) developed a multi objecttive linear model for operational cleanup schedules and coastal protection plans during an oil spill event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%