2022
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2022.3150795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Interactive and Adaptive Learning Cyber Physical Human System for Manufacturing With a Case Study in Worker Machine Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A machine-learning pipeline of skeleton-based action recognition is implemented to recognize worker actions with respect to machine states. [27] Concurrently, an unsupervised method is applied on the power signal to detect the state transition of specific machine components, as demonstrated in Reference [28] The design methodology of the two ML agents leverages the causality underlying worker machine interactions to develop two applications. The first application provides a non-intrusive real time monitoring function of the manufacturing workflow with interactive features.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A machine-learning pipeline of skeleton-based action recognition is implemented to recognize worker actions with respect to machine states. [27] Concurrently, an unsupervised method is applied on the power signal to detect the state transition of specific machine components, as demonstrated in Reference [28] The design methodology of the two ML agents leverages the causality underlying worker machine interactions to develop two applications. The first application provides a non-intrusive real time monitoring function of the manufacturing workflow with interactive features.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The worker action recognition algorithm of the non-intrusive workflow monitoring is composed of a cascaded NN where the first NN is a pose estimation software to extract the skeletal representations of human bodies from raw videos. [27] Compared to raw videos, the skeletal representations that are matrices of (25 Â 3 Â number of people in the scene) need much less bandwidth for data transmission. The video streams we tested for the worker action recognition algorithm and object detection are 640 Â 480 at a rate of 15 frames per second (about 0.7 Mbps using H.264 coding).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Wang et al [ 69 ] focus on learning capabilities, mainly proposing solutions that involve AI algorithms. In the case of Ren et al [ 70 ], an adaptive ML-based CPHS with a 12.5% detection accuracy is proposed. Such a proposal leverages the causality of human–machine interactions and is initialized by a priori knowledge and pre-processed public datasets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 compares the main Industry 5.0 characteristics of the most relevant analyzed CPSs and CPHSs. As it can be observed, the majority of the documented solutions are aimed at implementing smart manufacturing systems [ 36 , 52 , 56 , 57 , 68 , 70 ], and there are also a relevant number of papers that describe CPSs/CPHSs for the healthcare industry [ 51 , 64 , 65 ], for smart grids and smart energy production systems [ 50 , 54 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 66 ], and for smart infrastructure monitoring and control [ 55 , 67 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Correlation Agent receives the detection results of worker actions and machine component states from the two ML agents respectively and conducts cross confirmation with the reference Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). [15] The Correlation Agent consists of the correlation & confirmation module in Figure 2. The reasoning behind this confirmation is that the SOP defines the sequence of worker actions and corresponding machine component feedback, which can be used to check the consistency between the worker and machine state transitions.…”
Section: Correlation Agentmentioning
confidence: 99%