2021
DOI: 10.1007/s41870-021-00710-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intelligent handoff optimization algorithm for network selection in heterogeneous networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dhand et al [24] developed a network selection model consisting of fuzzy AHP and ELECTRE, where fuzzy AHP is utilized to obtain the weight of each criterion, and ELECTRE is utilized to rate networks. Results showed that the model could effectively select the optimal network, but it has not been validated against the RRP.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dhand et al [24] developed a network selection model consisting of fuzzy AHP and ELECTRE, where fuzzy AHP is utilized to obtain the weight of each criterion, and ELECTRE is utilized to rate networks. Results showed that the model could effectively select the optimal network, but it has not been validated against the RRP.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To resolve this issue, there is a requirement for an instrument to foresee the traffic observing around the reach and afterward anticipating it through the available data sets. [18] Secondly, it is great challenge to define an edge of a cell when there is a collision two or more different networks. This zone should be treated as a genuine dynamic region for which different arrangement of measurements can be considered and applied for.…”
Section: Challenges Of Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to differentiate from previous studies on heterogeneous network selection [30], the network density of the studied network selection problem is highlighted. The system model in this paper not only increases the type and number of networks, but also adds the number of networks.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to feedback from users, eMMB services have greater demands on network bandwidth and delay, while URLLC services are more sensitive to network delay and jitter and mMTC services have higher requirements for network packet loss rate and price. Therefore, to effectively distinguish the different needs of different services for the network, it is necessary to assign different weights of network attribute parameters to different services when constructing the reward function [32], [33]. In this paper, the AHP is used to assign subjective weights to different network attributes.…”
Section: Determination Of Network Parameter Attribute Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%