2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrative test of agility, speed and skill in soccer: Effects of exercise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on her/his experience, the player must decide the right response, generating a displacement coherent to this response. Then, the reaction time, total response time, and correctness of response variables are quantified (Bullock et al [26]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on her/his experience, the player must decide the right response, generating a displacement coherent to this response. Then, the reaction time, total response time, and correctness of response variables are quantified (Bullock et al [26]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sports-specific field tests not only reflect real game distances covered, but also the number of different movement categories. Agility sprints and straight sprints are among the major types of these tests (Bullock et al, 2012). Yet, such tests might not be ideal for measuring physical fitness of soccer players since these measures do not evaluate skills requiring decision-making processes, such as ball-shooting to a target.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In team sports such as soccer, agility is an important quality for evading opponents when attacking or for placing pressure on opponents when defending (Young and Willey, 2010). Soccer also involves perceptual-motor skills that operate simultaneously in a rapidly changing environment (Bullock et al, 2012; Sheppard and Young, 2006). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lIMItatIons and recoMMendatIons for future research the main limitation of most studies mentioned in this review interferes with the principle of scientific reproducibility and the consistency of research findings [11,12,25], as already demonstrated in previous review studies [20,21]. Particularly, it comes from: (i) the lack of definition and classification of the skillrelated variables under investigation concerning match context (we proposed these definitions [table 2] on the basis of the literature research); (ii) the contextualization of the sample omitted and the influence of match situational variables (e.g.…”
Section: Other Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the total of 27 recruited papers carried out an analysis of technical actions with the use of validated instruments; 3 of them (11.1%) employed the following instruments in match context: team Sport Assessment Procedure (tSAP) [22], system of assessment of functional asymmetry of the lower limbs in football (SAFALL-FOOt) [23], Offensive Sequences characterization System (OScS) [24]; 24 (88.9%) assessed technical actions outside the match context, applying the reactive motor skills test (rMSt) [25], as well as dribbling, shooting, heading, and Loughborough passing tests [10][11][12]26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%