2009
DOI: 10.1108/00483481011012809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrative review of employer branding and OB theory

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to review the existing literature linked to the emerging field of employer branding, with a view to adding insight from the perspective of the management of human resources.Design/methodology/approachThe approach taken entails reviewing books and academic journals from the area of marketing, organisational behaviour (OB) and business management. The review shows that research and theory from a range of fields can help add to one's knowledge of employer branding; these includ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
271
0
51

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(328 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
271
0
51
Order By: Relevance
“…A powerful EVP includes tangible and intangible elements (Martin et al, 2005;Edwards, 2010;Stahl et al, 2012), comparable with Lievens' (2007) division of attributes into instrumental (objective, physical, and tangible) and symbolic (subjective, abstract, and intangible) traits. Significant parts of what the target group perceives as attractive will be ignored if employers only focus on job and organizational attributes when forming the EVP (ibid.).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A powerful EVP includes tangible and intangible elements (Martin et al, 2005;Edwards, 2010;Stahl et al, 2012), comparable with Lievens' (2007) division of attributes into instrumental (objective, physical, and tangible) and symbolic (subjective, abstract, and intangible) traits. Significant parts of what the target group perceives as attractive will be ignored if employers only focus on job and organizational attributes when forming the EVP (ibid.).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is of great importance to elucidate and consider these qualities in the process of formulating a proposal that can withstand doubt and critical examination, consequently being authentic, unique, and attractive in the eyes of current and potential employees. Individuals experiencing unexpected and irrational behaviors in an organization that diverge from the communicated proposal or clash with personal values will more likely look for new job opportunities (Behrend et al, 2009;Edwards, 2010). Lawler (2005, p. 11) states: "And when they do not get what they want, today's workers are quick to move on to more attractive employment situations."…”
Section: Merging Employer Branding and Gender Equality When Developinmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A wide array of practitioners and academics have contributed to the literature regarding employer branding (CIPD, 2007;Edwards, 2010).…”
Section: Defining Employer Brandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lloyd (2002) (cited in Berthon, Ewing, & Hah, 2005, p. 153) defined employer branding as "the sum of a company's efforts to communicate to existing and prospective staff that it is a desirable place to work". With employer branding, the branded product is therefore the unique and particular employment experience that the company claims to offer to current and potential employees (Edwards, 2010). The "employment offering" that the organisation refers to in its communication thus lies at the very core of employer branding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%