An integrated utility-based model of conflict evaluation and resolution in the Stroop task.

Abstract

Cognitive control allows humans to direct and coordinate their thoughts and actions in a flexible way, in order to reach internal goals regardless of interference and distraction. The hallmark test used to examine cognitive control is the Stroop task, which elicits both the weakly learned but goal-relevant and the strongly learned but goal-irrelevant response tendencies, and requires people to follow the former while ignoring the latter. After reviewing the existing computational models of cognitive control in the Stroop task, its novel, integrated utility-based model is proposed. The model uses 3 crucial control mechanisms: response utility reinforcement learning, utility-based conflict evaluation using the Festinger formula for assessing the conflict level, and top-down adaptation of response utility in service of conflict resolution. Their complex, dynamic interaction led to replication of 18 experimental effects, being the largest data set explained to date by 1 Stroop model. The simulations cover the basic congruency effects (including the response latency distributions), performance dynamics and adaptation (including EEG indices of conflict), as well as the effects resulting from manipulations applied to stimulation and responding, which are yielded by the extant Stroop literature.

Motivation and cognitive control in depression

“…In order to separately predict reaction times on correct trials and accuracies we fitted Chuderski & Smolen, 2016;Heathcote et al, 1991;MacLeod, 1991) for the reaction times, and for accuracy 2 (intercept: M = 2.5; SD = 3;…”

Fluid Intelligence as a Mediator of the Relationship between Executive Control and Balanced Time Perspective

“…The descriptions of BTP include some clear references to intellectual ability and imply that cognitive resources might be necessary to use temporal perspectives effectively. Cognitive flexibility enables individuals to achieve their goals and override automatic processes and is usually regarded as a component of executive functioning (also referred to as executive control ; Miyake et al, 2000; Diamond, 2013; Chuderski and Smolen, 2016). Recent studies have shown that two types of executive function appear to be relevant to personality, namely working memory capacity and response inhibition (Hofmann et al, 2012).…”

Neural Underpinnings of Decision Strategy Selection: A Review and a Theoretical Model

“…In order to go beyond empirical data and to understand the cognitive processes fully it is important to test mechanistic process models that try to explicitly state the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms (cf. Wichary et al, 2015b; Chuderski and Smolen, 2016). Within the domain of strategy selection in multi-attribute choice, there exists an empirical challenge described by Newell (2005) that it is impossible to distinguish, based on behavior, the accuracy of the unified and multiple strategy models described in the previous section.…”