2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2008.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated sulfur isotope model for Namibian shelf sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
87
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(138 reference statements)
7
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total residual OS is typically more 34 S-enriched than its sulfur source, broadly indicating an equilibrium isotope effect in its formation. This relationship holds both in a global compilation of rocks, where pyrite δ 34 S is taken to represent HS s (Bottrell and Raiswell, 2000) and in modern marine sediments (Dale et al, 2009 Based on the above evidence, we propose that OM sulfurization may be associated with equilibrium or kinetic isotope effects under different conditions (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Isotope Effects During Om Sulfurizationmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Total residual OS is typically more 34 S-enriched than its sulfur source, broadly indicating an equilibrium isotope effect in its formation. This relationship holds both in a global compilation of rocks, where pyrite δ 34 S is taken to represent HS s (Bottrell and Raiswell, 2000) and in modern marine sediments (Dale et al, 2009 Based on the above evidence, we propose that OM sulfurization may be associated with equilibrium or kinetic isotope effects under different conditions (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Isotope Effects During Om Sulfurizationmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…We also focus on the importance of DNRA to N turnover since previous modeling studies suggest that it may dominate benthic sulfur and nitrogen cycling in suboxic upwelling regions as well as organic-rich costal sediments where sulfide accumulates in the porewater (e.g. Dale et al, 2009;. Furthermore, because of the widespread occurrence of bacterial mats off southern Peru and Chile we expect this process to be significant (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected 2 values to estimate the benthic contribution: an average value of + 5.75 ‰ versus VCDT was used as the isotopically light end member representing spatially pooled freeze-dried sediment containing diatoms, benthic meiofauna and sulphur bacteria. An alternative value of -15 ‰ versus VCDT was used as the second end member based on previous measurements at a shelf station at 23°45.5' S, 14°16.0' E in 114 m water depth (Dale et al 2009). We based the use of this value on the fact that sulphur available to grazing gobies is porewater hydrogen sulphide, organic sulphur and elemental sulphur stored in sulphur bacteria, but not mineral sulphides and inorganic sulphate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We based the use of this value on the fact that sulphur available to grazing gobies is porewater hydrogen sulphide, organic sulphur and elemental sulphur stored in sulphur bacteria, but not mineral sulphides and inorganic sulphate. The origin of the sulphides and elemental sulphur is through production by sulphate-reducing bacteria, which fractionate porewater sulphate to derive hydrogen sulphide with a value of -15 ‰ (Dale et al 2009). The fatty acid data were analysed quantitatively (µg mg -1 DW relative to a standard, 23:0) and qualitatively (as percentage of TFA), the latter being useful in situations where samples vary greatly in their TFA content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%