2014
DOI: 10.1080/0965254x.2014.914071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated model of firms’ brand likeability: antecedents and consequences

Abstract: Likeability plays an important role for firms that rely on their brands.However, few studies examine factors influencing customers' perceptions of likeable firm brands. Adapting a Private Brand model, the current study proposes a model of brand likeability that integrates four key variables measuring customer characteristics, namely: price consciousness, perceived quality, perceived risk and familiarity. Using an online survey to collect data, the study employs partial least square based structural equation mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale items that were used in this research for the latent variables, after purification, are presented in Table . The attractiveness of the digital influencer construct (“attractiveness”) encompasses “likeability” and “familiarity”, which were measured using scales that were adapted from Ha and Perks () and Nguyen, Choudhury, and Melewar (), respectively. The brand attitude was measured using Colliander and Dahlén's () scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale items that were used in this research for the latent variables, after purification, are presented in Table . The attractiveness of the digital influencer construct (“attractiveness”) encompasses “likeability” and “familiarity”, which were measured using scales that were adapted from Ha and Perks () and Nguyen, Choudhury, and Melewar (), respectively. The brand attitude was measured using Colliander and Dahlén's () scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the explanation for the above results can be better understood by applying the theory of familiarity as propounded by Gestalt theory (Qiu & von der Heydt, 2005). Familiarity gives customers the ability to avoid products that fail to meet their criteria (Lin, Marshall, & Dawson, ; Nguyen, Choudhary, & Melewar, ). Familiarity brings attention followed by a response like recognition or positive feeling, and action (ARA) such as a purchase intention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the actual or expected separation of this availability can, hence, produce separation distress, a sense of loss (Park and MacInnis, 2006) and feelings of anxiety in the consumer's mind (Shimul et al, 2019). Experiencing or anticipating these feelings can undermine the consumer's confidence in the product or service (Batra et al, 2012;Nguyen et al, 2015). Examples in prior literature include iPod and portable music services (Park et al, 2010), online social media (VanMeter et al, 2015), retail services (Brocato et al, 2015), personal travel services (Aro et al, 2018) and airline services (Prentice et al, 2019).…”
Section: Service Separation and Separation Distressmentioning
confidence: 99%