An integrated lean approach to Process Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (PFMEA): A case study from automotive industry

Banduka, Nikola; Veža, Ivica; Bilić, Boženko

doi:10.14743/apem2016.4.233

Cited by 27 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are two main types of FMEA, as mentioned by Banduka [28]: (a) the analysis related to the design phase, shortened to DFMEA; and (b) the analysis related to productive processes, shortened to PFMEA. A crucial difference is that, for the DFMEA, the end user is a distant entity, whereas for the PFMEA, the end user could be the next user in the process.…”

Section: Fmea Generalitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Business Model Canvas as an Analytical Tool for the Evaluation of Companies: Case Study for the Audiovisual Industry in Bogota, Colombia

Ruiz-Ramírez

Reyes-Cancino

Arenas-Castro

2019

SAJIE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper discusses analytical applications of the business model canvas (BMC) formulated by Osterwalder & Pigneur [1]. From this model, a methodological tool was devised and used as part of an academic research project, in which the categories (blocks) of the BMC were taken as conceptual categories and further processed through a failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). The specifics of reversing the business model canvas are examined, since the model was conceived for entrepreneurs and not strictly for the analysis of pre-existing companies. The application of the tool was done within the multidisciplinary mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) project 'Business dynamics of the audiovisual industry in Bogota', which was carried out from October 2017 to May 2019 at Manuela Beltran University in Bogota, Colombia. The methodological tool was applied to 32 key companies and four institutions of the local audiovisual industry through semi-structured interviews with people in managerial positions. The nine blocks of the BMC were conceptually developed to analyse the empirical data, holding them as internal variables. The assessment of the variables revealed opportunities for the growth and development of the companies and the whole industry, as well as patterns for the existing business models of the companies.

show abstract

Section: Fmea Generalitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Business Model Canvas as an Analytical Tool for the Evaluation of Companies: Case Study for the Audiovisual Industry in Bogota, Colombia

Ruiz-Ramírez

Reyes-Cancino

Arenas-Castro

2019

SAJIE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…And the software gives a view of stress distribution in the whole connecting rod which gives the information that which parts are to be hardened or given attention during manufacturing stage. 7) K. Sudershn Kumar et al [7] analysed Two Wheeler Connecting Rod. In this project connecting rod was replaced by Aluminium reinforced with Boron carbide for Suzuki GS150R motorbike.…”

Section: ) Pantazopoulos and Tsinopoulosmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of Process FMEA during Assembling of a Connecting Rod

Kumar¹

2018

IJRASET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A failure modes and effective analysis procedure is used in connecting rod production and assembling operation development and operation management for analysis of potential failure modes within a system for classification by the severity of the failures. A successful FMEA activity helps a identify potential failure modes of connecting rod based on past experience with similar products or processes, enabling the team to design the failures out of the system with the minimum of effort and resource expenditure, thereby reducing development time and cost. The application of FMEA in automotive Industry is a trend nowadays. Both PFMEA and DFMEA have the same main purpose identification prevention and correction of failures during the production process of connecting rod but, PFMEA have many shortcomings. In many cases, the major reason behind or causing catastrophic engine failure is the occurrence of the connecting-rod failure. The major aim of the current work is to analyse the connecting rod failure.

show abstract

“…The risk takes into account the possibility of occurrence and the effect of a defect [5]. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) [6,7] can be used for quantitative risk assessment. The value of the risk priority number (RPN) found by the FMEA method can be used for risk-oriented Pareto analysis and identification of priority defects.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of Possibilities of Joint Application of Pareto Analysis and Risk Analysis During Corrective Actions

Haievskyi¹

2020

Technology transfer: fundamental principles and innovative tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Continuous improvement in the quality management system is based on corrective action. Corrective actions require the identification of priority defects that require priority elimination of the causes of occurrence. The traditional method of prioritization can be considered a Pareto chart, built by the number of identified inconsistencies. This technique makes it possible to prioritize the most frequently detected defects. However, defects that are rare can significantly outweigh those that are often encountered in their consequences. The defect risk is a complex indicator that simultaneously takes into account both the number of detected defects and their impact. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) can be used to quantify risk. This technique allows to determine the risk priority number (RPN), taking into account the number of detected defects (O), the consequences of the appearance of a defect (S) and the possibility of timely detection of a defect or cause before the onset of undesirable consequences (D). The priority number of risks numerically characterizes the risks of a defect and can be used as a criterion for determining priority defects. Based on the values of the priority number of risks, a Pareto chart can be built and defects that form 80% of the risk area can be identified. These defects require urgent corrective action. According to the data taken from production, it is shown that the Pareto analysis by the priority number of risks gives results that differ from the analysis by the number of identified inconsistencies. Application of the proposed approach will allow introducing risk-oriented methods into the procedures for carrying out corrective actions. This will make it possible to direct the resources of the enterprise to eliminate the causes of defects that are actually detected and can have the most significant consequences for consumers of products

show abstract

An integrated lean approach to Process Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (PFMEA): A case study from automotive industry

Cited by 27 publications

References 0 publications

Business Model Canvas as an Analytical Tool for the Evaluation of Companies: Case Study for the Audiovisual Industry in Bogota, Colombia

Business Model Canvas as an Analytical Tool for the Evaluation of Companies: Case Study for the Audiovisual Industry in Bogota, Colombia

Implementation of Process FMEA during Assembling of a Connecting Rod

Study of Possibilities of Joint Application of Pareto Analysis and Risk Analysis During Corrective Actions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About