2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An institutional perspective of public relations practices in the Chinese cultural contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, the literature has conceptually and empirically linked public relations to institutional work. For example, Fredriksson (2014) has conceptualized crisis communication as institutional work; Hou and Zhu (2012) have used the institutional work framework to explain how public relations practitioners in China construct the field of public relations in response to the peculiar Chinese normative institutions. This study furthers the relationship between public relations and institutional work and frames activist public relations as institutional work (Hou, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, the literature has conceptually and empirically linked public relations to institutional work. For example, Fredriksson (2014) has conceptualized crisis communication as institutional work; Hou and Zhu (2012) have used the institutional work framework to explain how public relations practitioners in China construct the field of public relations in response to the peculiar Chinese normative institutions. This study furthers the relationship between public relations and institutional work and frames activist public relations as institutional work (Hou, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few scholars applied neo-institutionalism to public relations and related fields (e.g., Fredriksson et al, 2013;Hou & Zhu, 2012;Merkelsen, 2013). From a neo-institutional perspective, Hou and Zhu (2012) defined public relations as a process in which the cultural setting of an organization is interpreted, negotiated, and shaped to build favorable conditions.…”
Section: Neo-institutional Public Relations and Legitimacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few scholars applied neo-institutionalism to public relations and related fields (e.g., Fredriksson et al, 2013;Hou & Zhu, 2012;Merkelsen, 2013). From a neo-institutional perspective, Hou and Zhu (2012) defined public relations as a process in which the cultural setting of an organization is interpreted, negotiated, and shaped to build favorable conditions. Similarly, Fredriksson et al (2013) emphasized that public relations is concerned with interpreting and formulating, but also with creating institutional factors such as social values and expectations: public relations acts as "as a carrier and translator of these institutional elements [norms, rules, values, and expectations] as well as their maintainer and creator" (p. 169).…”
Section: Neo-institutional Public Relations and Legitimacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the Chinese heritage over thousands of years, the Chinese government has continuously controlled not only valuable tangible resources, such as capital and land, but also intangible resources, such as approval mechanisms and preferential policies, on which organizations depend for their survival and development (He & Tian, 2008). This elite authoritarianism is a critical aspect of Chinese culture that undergirds Chinese PR practices (Hou & Zhu, 2012; Wu, 2002), and we will examine it here.…”
Section: Institutional Theories: Logics and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%