2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13204-018-0751-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An insight into the dopant selection for CeO2-based resistive-switching memory system: a DFT and experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After confirmation of charge filaments formation behavior of ATiO 3 , Cu was doped substitutionally in place of Ti along with single oxygen vacancy. The geometry optimizations, formation energy, electronic density of states, iso‐surface charge density, and integrated charge density function have been determined using Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) functionals under generalized gradient estimation/approximation (GGA) involving Hubbard U variable (GGA + U), 33‐35 for including Coulombic attraction within exchange and nonlocal exchange relationship parameters to obtain accurate outcomes 8,36,37 . These U parameters will act on delocalized electrons present in d ‐orbital (atoms) of Ti and Cu.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After confirmation of charge filaments formation behavior of ATiO 3 , Cu was doped substitutionally in place of Ti along with single oxygen vacancy. The geometry optimizations, formation energy, electronic density of states, iso‐surface charge density, and integrated charge density function have been determined using Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) functionals under generalized gradient estimation/approximation (GGA) involving Hubbard U variable (GGA + U), 33‐35 for including Coulombic attraction within exchange and nonlocal exchange relationship parameters to obtain accurate outcomes 8,36,37 . These U parameters will act on delocalized electrons present in d ‐orbital (atoms) of Ti and Cu.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These U parameters will act on delocalized electrons present in d ‐orbital (atoms) of Ti and Cu. The correction made by these parameters make the bandgap results more accurate as compared to conventional DFT results obtained without using U parameters 8,38 . Hubbard U values for Cu and Ti were chosen as 5.0 and 8.0 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…( 8) was used to calculate the formation energy of the complex, and the results are displayed in Table VI. It has been well-documented by Hussain et al 41 and others that a lower formation energy is an indicator of stability of a structure.…”
Section: Dopingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the case of the TM adatom doping, the TM atoms are outwards from the phosphorene surface, where the dopant elevation decreases monotonically with respect to the dopant covalent radius [19]. Regarding the stability, the substitutionally doped phosphorene has higher binding energies (up to 8.3 eV) than the adatom doped phosphorene(up to 4.6 eV) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], but both doping schemes are expected to be stabilized by chemical bonds (excepting Zn) as a result of the hybridization between d orbitals of TM dopants and 3p orbitals of phosphorene [14,16,19,22]. The wide range of binding stability reached by TM dopants in phosphorene has been explained due to the filling of the d orbitals through the TM series, causing several changes in the properties of phosphorene such as bandgap decreasing due to midgap states, electron charge-transfer from TM to the phosphorene nanosheet due to electronegativity differences, and induced magnetic moments by spin-polarized dopants [11, 12, 14-16, 19, 20, 22, 23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%