“…In the case of the TM adatom doping, the TM atoms are outwards from the phosphorene surface, where the dopant elevation decreases monotonically with respect to the dopant covalent radius [19]. Regarding the stability, the substitutionally doped phosphorene has higher binding energies (up to 8.3 eV) than the adatom doped phosphorene(up to 4.6 eV) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], but both doping schemes are expected to be stabilized by chemical bonds (excepting Zn) as a result of the hybridization between d orbitals of TM dopants and 3p orbitals of phosphorene [14,16,19,22]. The wide range of binding stability reached by TM dopants in phosphorene has been explained due to the filling of the d orbitals through the TM series, causing several changes in the properties of phosphorene such as bandgap decreasing due to midgap states, electron charge-transfer from TM to the phosphorene nanosheet due to electronegativity differences, and induced magnetic moments by spin-polarized dopants [11, 12, 14-16, 19, 20, 22, 23].…”