2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2012.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Initial Study of the Effect of Using Liquid Nitrogen Coolant on the Surface Roughness of Inconel 718 Nickel-Based Alloy in CNC Milling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results for milling Inconel 718 were reported by Shokrani et al [204]. In the above-mentioned studies [3,111,204], the cryogenic media was supplied externally onto the tool. Recent research work has focused on the supply of CO 2 through the spindle and the tool in order to improve the cooling effect near the cutting edge.…”
Section: Cryogenic Machiningsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Similar results for milling Inconel 718 were reported by Shokrani et al [204]. In the above-mentioned studies [3,111,204], the cryogenic media was supplied externally onto the tool. Recent research work has focused on the supply of CO 2 through the spindle and the tool in order to improve the cooling effect near the cutting edge.…”
Section: Cryogenic Machiningsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The results showed that tool life of mills in down-copying is longer than mills in up-copying due to lower effective cutting speed during the copy-milling. A. Shokrani et.al [12] presents one of the very first studies on cryogenic CNC end milling of the Inconel 718 nickel based alloy using TiAlN coated solid carbide tools. Cutting parameters selected were tool diameter, cutting speed, fees rate, depth of cut and immersion rate whereas response factors selected were surface roughness, tool wear and power consumption.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shokrani et al [4] discovered a 40% reduction in surface roughness (R a ) compared to dry turning under cryogenic cooling. Although there is clear interest in the cryogenic assisted machining [5], the available publications reveal many contradictory results, such as an increase and decrease of the cutting forces and premature tool failure [6]- [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a value of approximately 5x10 4 W/m².K was reported by Jawahir et al [14] for cryogenic cooling during machining. Pusavec et al [15] proposed a value of 2.5x10 5 W/m².K, whereas Hribersek [13] proposes an h coefficient of approximately 1.5x10 4 , which was determined by the inverse method based on cutting temperature measurement and numerical simulations. All of those values were determined by using several approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%