1987
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.1060050105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inexpensive and highly efficient device for observing a transmitted electron image in SEM

Abstract: An inexpensive, efficient device that supplies a transmission mode to the conventional SEM has been developed. The transmitted electrons strike a metal plate, and these generate secondary electrons that are proportional to the quantity of the transmitted electrons. The generated electrons are collected by the secondary electron detector. Hence, the performance of this device is influenced by the number of secondary electrons generated in the metal plate. In order to construct a device that can attain the best … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The least expensive system for obtaining TEM-like images with almost any SEM, the mode we have called pseudo-TSEM, has been reassessed recently by Oho, Sasaki , Adachi, Muranaka, and Kanaya (1987). These investigators made an inexpensive and highly efficient device for observing a transmitted electron image in SEM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The least expensive system for obtaining TEM-like images with almost any SEM, the mode we have called pseudo-TSEM, has been reassessed recently by Oho, Sasaki , Adachi, Muranaka, and Kanaya (1987). These investigators made an inexpensive and highly efficient device for observing a transmitted electron image in SEM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STEM-IN-SEM as compared with BF TEM observation of silver nanoparticles~Vanderlinde & Ballarotto, 2004! andbacteria~Bogner et al, 2007!. Various specimen-holder geometries and detector arrangements have been used for STEM-IN-SEM imaging but have primarily focused on BF imaging~e.g., Crawford & Liley, 1970;Woolf et al, 1972;Oho et al, 1987aOho et al, , 1987bVanderlinde & Ballarotto, 2004;Merli & Morandi, 2005;Bogner et al, 2007! while work on DF imaging~e.g., Crawford & Liley, 1970;Merli & Morandi, 2005;Acevedo-Reyes et al, 2008;Brodusch et al, 2013!…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various specimen-holder geometries and detector arrangements have been used for STEM-IN-SEM imaging but have primarily focused on BF imaging (e.g., Crawford & Liley, 1970; Woolf et al, 1972; Oho et al, 1987 a , 1987 b ; Vanderlinde & Ballarotto, 2004; Merli & Morandi, 2005; Bogner et al, 2007) while work on DF imaging (e.g., Crawford & Liley, 1970; Merli & Morandi, 2005; Acevedo-Reyes et al, 2008; Brodusch et al, 2013) has been limited by technology (until recently) or by the costly acquisition of new instrumentation (e.g., detectors). STEM-IN-SEM imaging has been applied to morphological observation of various polymer-based latex particles (Geng et al, 2013), mask metrology (Klein et al, 2012), X-ray elemental mapping (Stokes & Baken, 2007), X-ray spectral imaging of thin specimens prepared by a focused ion beam method (Kotula, 2009), particle-size distribution measurements both in BF (Klein et al, 2011) and DF (with a dedicated detector) (Acevedo-Reyes et al, 2008), as well as extreme high resolution SEM, in which a monochromator and a 12-segment STEM detector provide the potential for sub-nanometer spatial resolution (Roussel et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just as in TEM/STEM, BF STEM‐IN‐SEM images form mass‐thickness contrast with signal intensity dependent on both the mass of the constituents in a specimen and the actual specimen thickness. Many microscope configurations for STEM‐IN‐SEM have been developed for BF imaging . Recently, using the lower voltage electron beam, larger field of view and exclusion of postspecimen projection lens in a SEM instrument, BF STEM‐IN‐SEM imaging has shown results similar to BF TEM observation of polymer morphology .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%