“…Various specimen-holder geometries and detector arrangements have been used for STEM-IN-SEM imaging but have primarily focused on BF imaging (e.g., Crawford & Liley, 1970; Woolf et al, 1972; Oho et al, 1987 a , 1987 b ; Vanderlinde & Ballarotto, 2004; Merli & Morandi, 2005; Bogner et al, 2007) while work on DF imaging (e.g., Crawford & Liley, 1970; Merli & Morandi, 2005; Acevedo-Reyes et al, 2008; Brodusch et al, 2013) has been limited by technology (until recently) or by the costly acquisition of new instrumentation (e.g., detectors). STEM-IN-SEM imaging has been applied to morphological observation of various polymer-based latex particles (Geng et al, 2013), mask metrology (Klein et al, 2012), X-ray elemental mapping (Stokes & Baken, 2007), X-ray spectral imaging of thin specimens prepared by a focused ion beam method (Kotula, 2009), particle-size distribution measurements both in BF (Klein et al, 2011) and DF (with a dedicated detector) (Acevedo-Reyes et al, 2008), as well as extreme high resolution SEM, in which a monochromator and a 12-segment STEM detector provide the potential for sub-nanometer spatial resolution (Roussel et al, 2009).…”