2018
DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2017.2749619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Indicator-Based Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm With Reference Point Adaptation for Better Versatility

Abstract: Abstract-During the past two decades, a variety of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have been proposed in the literature. As pointed out in some recent studies, however, the performance of an MOEA can strongly depend on the Pareto front shape of the problem to be solved, whereas most existing MOEAs show poor versatility on problems with different shapes of Pareto fronts. To address this issue, we propose an MOEA based on an enhanced inverted generational distance indicator, in which an adaptation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
157
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 524 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
157
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing adaptation methods change the local density of reference points on the unit simplex. Such changes may not ensure the versatility and may also disturb the uniformity [27,28]. Moreover, the frequent periodic adaptations seem not appropriate, for they cannot judge the need for the adaptations, especially for the problems with full PFs where adaptations may push the population toward a part of the true PF [47,48].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existing adaptation methods change the local density of reference points on the unit simplex. Such changes may not ensure the versatility and may also disturb the uniformity [27,28]. Moreover, the frequent periodic adaptations seem not appropriate, for they cannot judge the need for the adaptations, especially for the problems with full PFs where adaptations may push the population toward a part of the true PF [47,48].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quite different from the dominance-based ideas, the indicator-based algorithms map the proximity and diversity of the population into designed indicators, such as hypervolume (HV) [23,24], averaged Hausdorff distance [25], R2-indicator [26] and IGD-NS indicator [27]. On one hand, researches have shown that the extensive compu-arXiv:1803.01097v4 [cs.NE] 20 Aug 2019 tation for the indicators in high-dimensional objective spaces still remains as a bottleneck [28], though some contributions have been made to alleviate the computational burden [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A performance analysis is done to evaluate the reliability of the solutions. Six multi-objective optimization algorithms are compared (1) ARMOEA [32]; (2) NSGA-II [33]; (3) SPEA2 [34]; (4) GrEA [35]; (5) RSEA [36] and VaEA [37].…”
Section: B the Whole Track Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decomposition strategy, where a complex multi-objective problem is decomposed into several single-objective problems or several simpler multi-objective problems, such as NSGA-III [19] and MOEA/DM [20]. Performance indicator strategy, where measurement quality of solutions is used as criteria of selection, and two widely used approaches are hypervolume-based evolutionary algorithm (HypE) [21] and an indicator based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with reference point (AR-MOEA) [22]. Consequently, such processing methods and improved strategies, which adopt to sensing characteristics of cameras on a road network, can be introduced into the coverage optimization issue of camera network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%