2007
DOI: 10.1504/ijvsmt.2007.016237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An in-wheel motor-based tyre test vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the drive equivalent inertias J r and J v , the servomotor torque response time constant T m , and the Coulomb friction torque M Cv in the case vertical axis drive) are estimated by means of the so-called drive starting and stopping experiment (see e.g. [11]). The parameter estimation procedure is based on the drive motion equations for the drive starting ( I ) under constant torque M m (facilitated by applying stepwise torque reference change to the torque/current control loop) and overall inertia J stopping under zero motor torque due to friction torque M f ( I I):…”
Section: Drive Parameters Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the drive equivalent inertias J r and J v , the servomotor torque response time constant T m , and the Coulomb friction torque M Cv in the case vertical axis drive) are estimated by means of the so-called drive starting and stopping experiment (see e.g. [11]). The parameter estimation procedure is based on the drive motion equations for the drive starting ( I ) under constant torque M m (facilitated by applying stepwise torque reference change to the torque/current control loop) and overall inertia J stopping under zero motor torque due to friction torque M f ( I I):…”
Section: Drive Parameters Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9]). Such a feedforward compensator is not used herein since the in-wheel motor time constant is very small (T m = 2 ms) [7]. Downloaded by [University of Saskatchewan Library] at 00: 13 15 October 2012 Apart from being widely used and well understood, the main advantage of motor speed control compared with acceleration control [5,6] is lower sensitivity to noise (there is no need for taking a time-derivative of the speed signal).…”
Section: Traditional Slip-based Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controller accurately keeps the slip at the reference value (the steady-state slip error variations are suppressed below 0.5%), and the noise level in the commanded signal F app = M R /r is relatively low. The steady-state oscillations with the frequency of about 5 Hz are due to driven wheel vertical vibrations (stiff suspension is used [7]). The controller effectively suppresses the slip excursion at t ∼ = 0.5 s (in only 50 ms), which is caused by the tyre force drop from a lowvelocity dynamic tyre friction potential [7,10] to the static friction potential.…”
Section: Traditional Slip-based Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations