2016
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2016/20892.8665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An In-vitro Evaluation of Retention, Colonization and Penetration of Commonly Used Denture Lining Materials By Candida albicans

Abstract: a) Smoother surfaces retain fewer cells than rough surfaces; b) Denture lining materials permit infiltration of through their structure; c) Denture lining materials have insignificant anti-fungal properties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
30
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Skupien et al [ 24 ] reported that denture cleansers or irradiation with microwave energy decreased yeast counts on the surfaces, but complete elimination was not always reached. Additionally, in vitro studies proved that Candida albicans ( C. albicans ) colonize the surface and penetrate into silicone soft lining materials, which was first reported by Bulard et al [ 25 ] and later confirmed by other studies [ 19 , 26 ]. These results suggested that the efficacy of typical cleaning agents might be limited, because the central section of denture soft linings can be a reservoir of Candida blastopores and hyphae forms [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Skupien et al [ 24 ] reported that denture cleansers or irradiation with microwave energy decreased yeast counts on the surfaces, but complete elimination was not always reached. Additionally, in vitro studies proved that Candida albicans ( C. albicans ) colonize the surface and penetrate into silicone soft lining materials, which was first reported by Bulard et al [ 25 ] and later confirmed by other studies [ 19 , 26 ]. These results suggested that the efficacy of typical cleaning agents might be limited, because the central section of denture soft linings can be a reservoir of Candida blastopores and hyphae forms [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Numerous studies have proved the varied effectiveness of removing microorganisms from the surface of prosthetic materials, for example, by using chlorhexidine gluconate, guanidine solution, peroxides, irradiation microwaves, or buy brushing with toothpaste, but these methods result in the loss of various functional properties, including increased roughness [17][18][19][20][21][22], which can facilitate the recolonization of prosthetic materials [23]. It should be emphasized that there are studies questioning the possibility of fully effective removal of microorganisms from the denture using mechanical or chemical cleaning methods [24], suggesting the possibility of penetration of C. albicans into the interior of acrylic materials [25][26][27] which indicates limited disinfection possibilities. Due to the problems associated with colonization by Candida species, investigations related with the development of new materials are being conducted in two directions: the introduction of additional monomers with antimicrobial properties and the manufacturing of composites by introducing the fillers with antimicrobial properties [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many reports suggest that most of the patients who wear removable dentures can suffer from denture stomatitis 5, 6, 7, 8. Denture relining materials are permanently used for sensitive patients to limit the traumatic effect of dentures by providing cushioning effect and also for denture relining to evenly distribute the loads transferred onto soft tissues during motion 9, 10. They are primarily used in patients with thin atrophic mucosa, with normal mucosa with an atrophied ridge, with a sharp alveolar ridge and when the mucosa exhibits a low tolerance to the load applied by the dentures 11, 12…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denture disinfectant agents such as chlorhexidine gluconate, sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide and more were reported to cause unfavourable changes to the physical and chemical properties of the soft liner 14, 15. Studies have reported that the fungi and bacterial species can enter porous spaces within the denture liner and that their colonization may reduce the intra-oral life of the material 9, 16. Antibiofilm activity of the soft liner is also an efficient feature to prevent the patients from infections with resident oral microorganisms 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%