The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
1990
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690361212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved technique for PID controller tuning from closed‐loop tests

Abstract: The proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller is the dominant type of controller used in current industrial practice. The behavior and capabilities of the PID controller are familiar to both the design engineer and the field operator, and it is relatively easy to tune manually by a variety of open-loop methods (Seborg et al., 1989). An important recent improvement in the PID controller tuning method is a self-tuning capability (Astrom and Hligglund, 1,984; Seborg et al., 1989), while the control loop i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following considerations regarding the optimization of performance of conventional controllers, as given by Lee et al (1990), the proportional gain (k c ) can be set as the result of the maximization problem:…”
Section: Closed-loop Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following considerations regarding the optimization of performance of conventional controllers, as given by Lee et al (1990), the proportional gain (k c ) can be set as the result of the maximization problem:…”
Section: Closed-loop Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bogere and Ozgen (1989) and Lee (1989) modified the Yuwana and Seborg method to identify a second-order plus time delay (SOPTD) without and with a zero respectively. Rangaiah and Krishnaswamy (1996) compared these two methods and recommended the method proposed by Lee et al (1990) since it identifies the system with a zero. Harini and Chidambaram (2005) extended the method to identify an unstable SOPTD model with a zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[6,10,33,34] An orthogonal basis function based model estimation technique has also been reported. [35] Identification from closed loop step response has been another area of extensive research; [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] there are some closed loop methods applicable for unstable processes [44][45][46] and for multiple input multiple output models. [47][48][49][50][51] Closed loop identification methods using optimization approaches have also been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%