2016
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.22645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification from step response – The integral equation approach

Abstract: An overview of identification of continuous‐time models from step responses using the integral equation approach is presented. Both open loop and closed loop identification as well as identification of multiple‐input‐multiple‐output (MIMO) models are considered. Solutions to practical implementation problems are provided and methods for identification with transient initial conditions using raw data as well as estimation algorithms in the presence of disturbances are outlined. The methodologies are presented i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(163 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, eq 6 can be transformed into the form of the integral equation as eq 7 , and then, eq 8 is obtained through the inverse Laplace transform, which can be written as the matrix form as eq 9 . 18 …”
Section: Process Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then, eq 6 can be transformed into the form of the integral equation as eq 7 , and then, eq 8 is obtained through the inverse Laplace transform, which can be written as the matrix form as eq 9 . 18 …”
Section: Process Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By integrating eq 8 on both sides to increase the number of equations, the unknown steady-state value is solved. 18 However, multiple integrations will increase the error, and the solution effect may be not good.…”
Section: Process Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From step‐response tests, the auxiliary information regarding overshoot, the period between damped oscillations and the settling time seems to be a reasonable way to define the LMI regions in practice. Step response data are often employed to estimate second‐order dynamical models [2023]. However, the auxiliary information obtained from experimental data may be uncertain due to many reasons, e.g., the measurement noise on data and the complexity of the system dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The step identification approach is to estimate the parameters of CT models from step responses. Typical technologies related to this approach include the two‐point fitting method, the integral equation method [4], the frequency domain method [5], and so on [6]. The defect of this approach is that only the lower‐order models plus time delay such as first‐order plus time delay (FOPTD) and second‐order plus time delay (SOPTD) can be identified from step responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%