2012 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/coase.2012.6386330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved simulation budget allocation procedure to efficiently select the optimal subset of many alternatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sampling procedures in the Bayesian branch aim to either maximize the PCS or minimize the expected opportunity cost subject to a given sampling budget (see, e.g., [15], [16], [17]). Chen et al [18], Zhang et al [19], and Gao and Chen [20] study sampling procedures to maximize the PCS for selecting an optimal subset; Xiao and Lee [21] derive the convergence rate of the false subset-selection probability, and offer an allocation rule achieving an asymptotically optimal convergence rate; and Gao and Chen [22] develop a sampling procedure based on the expected opportunity cost. In R&S, the alternatives are ranked by the expectations of their sample performance, which can be directly estimated by the sample average of each alternative, whereas in our problem, the nodes are ranked by the stationary probabilities of the Markov chain, which are estimated indirectly from the interaction samples between different nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling procedures in the Bayesian branch aim to either maximize the PCS or minimize the expected opportunity cost subject to a given sampling budget (see, e.g., [15], [16], [17]). Chen et al [18], Zhang et al [19], and Gao and Chen [20] study sampling procedures to maximize the PCS for selecting an optimal subset; Xiao and Lee [21] derive the convergence rate of the false subset-selection probability, and offer an allocation rule achieving an asymptotically optimal convergence rate; and Gao and Chen [22] develop a sampling procedure based on the expected opportunity cost. In R&S, the alternatives are ranked by the expectations of their sample performance, which can be directly estimated by the sample average of each alternative, whereas in our problem, the nodes are ranked by the stationary probabilities of the Markov chain, which are estimated indirectly from the interaction samples between different nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three popular procedures of finding the best design are compared in [10]. Extensions of the research in OCBA and ranking and selection include subset selection [11][12][13], selecting the Pareto set for multiple objective functions [14], selecting the best design subject to stochastic constraints [15,16], and complete ranking [17]. A detailed summary of the existing work in OCBA can be found in [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure, called OCBA-m, allocates a limited computational budget across the k systems to maximize the probability of correct selection (PCS) that the top-m systems are chosen. Zhang et al (2012) present an improved version of this algorithm, called OCBA-m+, while LaPorte et al (2012) extend OCBA for subset selection under very small computing budgets. Ryzhov and Powell (2009) have also recently developed a subset selection algorithm for online problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%