2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved parameter fitting approach of a planar biaxial test including the experimental prestretch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure partially adapted from Vander Linden and colleagues. 19
Figure E2 Histogram showing the PWS ii values resulting from the probabilistic approach ( blue ) with the fitted probability density function ( solid line ) and the deterministic wall strength Y ii ( dotted line ). The corresponding probabilistic failure risk is −56.0 and −13.8 for i=θ ( left ) and i=z ( right ), respectively.
…”
Section: Appendix E4 Results Of the Probabilistic Failure Risk Assess...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure partially adapted from Vander Linden and colleagues. 19
Figure E2 Histogram showing the PWS ii values resulting from the probabilistic approach ( blue ) with the fitted probability density function ( solid line ) and the deterministic wall strength Y ii ( dotted line ). The corresponding probabilistic failure risk is −56.0 and −13.8 for i=θ ( left ) and i=z ( right ), respectively.
…”
Section: Appendix E4 Results Of the Probabilistic Failure Risk Assess...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculation of the intraluminal maximal wall stress requires information on the material behavior and in vivo wall thickness of the tissue. The material parameters s and wall thickness at diastole H dias were estimated using a material fitting approach explained in ( 18 , 19 ), by minimizing the difference between (1) the experimental ( f ii ) and model ( ) reaction forces in the direction i=θ,z of the planar biaxial test, (2) the measured ( H 0 ) and model ( ) ex vivo thickness and (3) the measured ( p sys ) and model ( ) systolic blood pressure ( Figure 3 ). Knowing the material parameters and in vivo thickness, the PWS ii , first Piola–Kirchhoff peak wall stress in the direction i at supra-systolic blood pressure, was calculated while approximating the aneurysm as a thin-walled cylinder.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our constitutive neural network consistently discovers second-invariant models. For decades, the gold standard in constitutive modeling has been to first select a constitutive model and then fit the model to data [5,6,17,32,60,69]. Attempts to improve the goodness of fit have slightly adjusted the terms of the model, and gradually modified or replaced individual terms [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%