The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2007.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved microbial assay for the detection of chloramphenicol residues in shrimp tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most sensitive microbial inhibition test method was reported by Shakila et al (2007) with a sensitivity of 1 µg/kg for shrimp tissue, but this involved an extraction procedure using a 100-g sample.…”
Section: Screening Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most sensitive microbial inhibition test method was reported by Shakila et al (2007) with a sensitivity of 1 µg/kg for shrimp tissue, but this involved an extraction procedure using a 100-g sample.…”
Section: Screening Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbial inhibition tests, such as the EC four-plate test (Lynas et al, 1998;Tajik et al, 2010) and the one-plate method (Koenen-Dierick et al, 1995) for chloramphenicol in tissue samples and some commercially available tests for chloramphenicol in milk samples (Althaus et al, 2003), are not sufficiently sensitive to determine chloramphenicol residues in test samples at the MRPL; the sensitivity of these methods for chloramphenicol was reported to be 300 µg/kg, 30 000 g/kg and 12 000 µg/kg, respectively. The most sensitive microbial inhibition test method was reported by Shakila et al (2007) with a sensitivity of 1 µg/kg for shrimp tissue, but this involved an extraction procedure using a 100-g sample.…”
Section: Screening Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shakila et al developed a microbial screening assay for the detection of CAP in shrimp after extraction with with EtOAc/NH4OH and ACN [230]. Luo et al…”
Section: Nitrofuransmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…European Community tries to uphold a high level of food standards to protect public health and safety7 and has set up minimum required performance level at 0.3 μg/kg for CAP in food of animal origin 8. Numerous methods such as enzyme linked immunosorbent assay,9 liquid chromatography (LC), and LC‐mass spectrometry (MS),10 gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry,11 microbial assays,12 capillary zone electrophoresis,13 chemiluminescence,14 biosensor‐based immunoassay,15 and immunoaffinity chromatography16 have been used for the determination of CAP in different samples. Although good results were obtained with the methods mentioned, more sensitive, rapid, and new detection techniques are still required for CAP determination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%