2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved methodology for determining threshold sooting indices from smoke point lamps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fuel consumption rates for all the fuels were found to vary only within 14.1-17.8%. It is evident from the figure that, for the same flame height, the average fuel consumption rate for all the fuels, shown by hollow markers, remained almost constant, which was also observed for several fuels studied in [49,50]. At the flame height of 15 mm, the fuel consumption rates for D and D5 reduced slightly as compared to those for D10 and D15 (maximum difference of about 15%).…”
Section: Smoke Point and Fuel Consumption Ratesupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fuel consumption rates for all the fuels were found to vary only within 14.1-17.8%. It is evident from the figure that, for the same flame height, the average fuel consumption rate for all the fuels, shown by hollow markers, remained almost constant, which was also observed for several fuels studied in [49,50]. At the flame height of 15 mm, the fuel consumption rates for D and D5 reduced slightly as compared to those for D10 and D15 (maximum difference of about 15%).…”
Section: Smoke Point and Fuel Consumption Ratesupporting
confidence: 63%
“…At the flame height of 15 mm, the fuel consumption rates for D and D5 reduced slightly as compared to those for D10 and D15 (maximum difference of about 15%). This is because, near the smoke point, the rate at which fuel consumption rate changes with flame height suddenly reduces as the flame makes a transition from non-sooting to sooting flame, and then increases again beyond the smoke point [50]. This transition was not very obvious in the cases of D10 and D15.…”
Section: Smoke Point and Fuel Consumption Ratementioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this study, the smoke point test burner [3] was used as simple, known and standardised way to test different liquid fuels in terms of their combustion at atmospheric conditions. This wick-fed burner (inset Figure 1), that has been previously described [43,44], was used to generate a laminar diffusion flame of liquid fuel. The burner consists of a cylindrical reservoir, with an inner concentric hole where the wick is placed, and a 7 mm i.d nozzle.…”
Section: Burnermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smoke points are experimentally determined by the ASTM D1322 smoke point test method [110] or a similar standardized smoke point variant [111]. Smoke point refers a wick flame height at which incipient sooting appears at the flame tip, the higher the SP, the lower the sooting tendency of the fuel.…”
Section: Sooting and Average Molecular Weight Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it has been suggested that the inclusion of MW in the correlation function for sooting is unnecessary and not supported by theory [125,126]. Despite attempts to remove the shortcomings of the TSI correlation method, Watson et al [111] have pointed out that the normalized soot point method that was proposed as an alternative continues to suffer from large errors for fuels with low sooting potential. Thus, Watson et al investigated a more precise method to determine the sooting point phenomena based upon fuel uptake rate measurement with threshold imaging (FURTI) to define the soot breakthrough condition.…”
Section: Sooting and Average Molecular Weight Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%