2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved method for quantitative risk assessment of unconfined offshore installations subjected to gas explosions

Abstract: Previous related research has focused on consequences analysis of confined rather than unconfined structures against explosion accidents. This paper introduces an improved method for quantitative risk assessment of unconfined offshore installations subjected to gas explosions. In the present study, a floating, production, storage, and offloading unit (FPSO) is given as an example to present the proposed method. Instead of the most unfavorable scenario, lots of random scenarios are selected by the probabilistic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Ref. [136] used the stochastic sampling method in explosion scenario identification to consider different affecting parameters such as wind direction, wind speed, leak rate, leak duration, leak direction, and leak position, and then analyzed the hazard distribution and summarized the main hazard factors that led to greater damage to the facility. It allows a better understanding of the mechanism of an accident and a better insight of how to assume such random variables in a future hazard analysis.…”
Section: Phase I: Hazard Information Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ref. [136] used the stochastic sampling method in explosion scenario identification to consider different affecting parameters such as wind direction, wind speed, leak rate, leak duration, leak direction, and leak position, and then analyzed the hazard distribution and summarized the main hazard factors that led to greater damage to the facility. It allows a better understanding of the mechanism of an accident and a better insight of how to assume such random variables in a future hazard analysis.…”
Section: Phase I: Hazard Information Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yi et al [25] and Ahmadi et al [26] established a CFD model to accurately predict the incident radiation of large LPG pool fires and the consequence of large-scale pool fires in storage terminals, respectively. Xu et al [27] introduced a quantitative risk assessment method for offshore platforms exposed to gas explosions. Bhardwaj et al [28] proposed a methodology for risk assessment and probabilistic modeling of fire and explosion accidents in FPSO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%