2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.08.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved mass spectrometric method for identification and quantification of phenolic compounds in apple fruits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
44
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recoveries were calculated in spiked tomato samples (average, n = 5) and ranged from 77 to 106% for the low fortification level (12.5 mg kg −1 ), and from 77 to 103% for the high level (50 mg kg −1 ). These results were comparable or even better than those reported by other authors (De Paepe et al, 2013;Ribas-Agustí et al, 2012;Sakakibara, Honda, Nakagawa, Ashida, & Kanazawa, 2003).…”
Section: Validation Of Mekc Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recoveries were calculated in spiked tomato samples (average, n = 5) and ranged from 77 to 106% for the low fortification level (12.5 mg kg −1 ), and from 77 to 103% for the high level (50 mg kg −1 ). These results were comparable or even better than those reported by other authors (De Paepe et al, 2013;Ribas-Agustí et al, 2012;Sakakibara, Honda, Nakagawa, Ashida, & Kanazawa, 2003).…”
Section: Validation Of Mekc Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Compared to other methods employing similar CE techniques, these obtained %RSD values were similar or even lower (Arce, Ríos, & Valcárcel, 1998;Ehala et al, 2005;HerreroMartínez et al, 2007). Moreover, compared to HPLC alternatives the obtained %RSD values were similar to those reported by other authors using DAD detection (Ribas-Agustí, Cáceres, Gratacós-Cubarsí, Sárraga, & Castellari, 2012) or even lower than those reported in HPLC-MS studies (De Paepe et al, 2013). Intra-(n = 5) and inter-day (n = 2) precision of migration times ranged from <0.1 to 0.2% and from <0.1 to 1.4%, respectively, for standards, and from <0.1 to 0.2% and from 0.3 to 1.7% respectively for spiked samples (Table 3).…”
Section: Validation Of Mekc Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An ultrasound assisted consecutive extraction with MeOH/ H 2 O (20/80, v/v) and 100 % MeOH on 0.5 g freeze-dried material was carried out (De Paepe et al 2013). The liquid chromatographic (LC) system consisted of an Accela TM quaternary solvent manager, a 'Hot Pocket' column oven (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) and a CTC PAL TM autosampler (CTC Analytics, Zwingen, Switzerland).…”
Section: Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Paepe et al (2013) developed and validated a method to identify phenolic compounds in apple extracts using UHPLC coupled with an Orbitrap. An accurate mass spectrometry technique allowed the identification of 39 phenolic compounds in apples, including flavonoids, proanthocyanidins, and phenolic acids.…”
Section: Hplc-hrmsmentioning
confidence: 99%