2011
DOI: 10.1198/jcgs.2010.09044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Iterative Proportional Scaling Procedure for Gaussian Graphical Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the computation could benefit from the decomposition. For more details about the decomposition of MLE, refer to [7,10,11,17,29]. …”
Section: Estimation Of Undirected Graphical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the computation could benefit from the decomposition. For more details about the decomposition of MLE, refer to [7,10,11,17,29]. …”
Section: Estimation Of Undirected Graphical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 3.1), the non-zero entries in the precision matrix can be inferred via Iterative Proportional Fitting [14].…”
Section: Parameter Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard approaches for regularization selection are known to result in overly dense graphs [12]. In this work, we divide the problem of learning the precision matrix into two steps: we first apply the BINCO method [13] to learn the sparsity structure of the graphical model; next we determine the non-zero elements in the precision matrix via Iterative Proportional Fitting (IPF) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also apply the chordal graph theory to retrieve the Markov structure to reduce the computational time using the recursive summation/integration technique. Our technique is then similar to those used in the efficient computation of maximum-likelihood estimator of graphical models (e.g., Badsberg and Malvestuto 2001;Hara and Takemura 2010;Xu et al 2011Xu et al , 2012Xu et al , 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%