2016
DOI: 10.3390/s16030291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Gaussian Mixture Model for Damage Propagation Monitoring of an Aircraft Wing Spar under Changing Structural Boundary Conditions

Abstract: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) technology is considered to be a key technology to reduce the maintenance cost and meanwhile ensure the operational safety of aircraft structures. It has gradually developed from theoretic and fundamental research to real-world engineering applications in recent decades. The problem of reliable damage monitoring under time-varying conditions is a main issue for the aerospace engineering applications of SHM technology. Among the existing SHM methods, Guided Wave (GW) and piezo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These services also challenge the traditional structural safety assessment and maintenance guarantee [1][2][3]. The application of structural health monitoring (SHM) technology, which has gradually become a popular research area, can effectively prevent major accidents, achieve the maintenance of conditions, and reduce maintenance costs [4][5][6][7]. Among the SHM methods, the elastic-wave-based SHM method is regarded as a promising damage monitoring method because it is sensitive to metal cracks and the impact damage of composite materials, and can be used to monitor structures in real time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These services also challenge the traditional structural safety assessment and maintenance guarantee [1][2][3]. The application of structural health monitoring (SHM) technology, which has gradually become a popular research area, can effectively prevent major accidents, achieve the maintenance of conditions, and reduce maintenance costs [4][5][6][7]. Among the SHM methods, the elastic-wave-based SHM method is regarded as a promising damage monitoring method because it is sensitive to metal cracks and the impact damage of composite materials, and can be used to monitor structures in real time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, traditional multivariate PDFs (such as a multivariate normal distribution) cannot model the PDF with multiple peaks. The multivariate mixture PDFs (such as multivariate normal mixture model), utilized in SHM and damage detection [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ], rely on the proper choice of the number and the type of the mixture distributions and an initial value of parameter vector in optimization [ 14 ]. The Nataf distribution, utilized in SHM and structural reliability [ 15 , 16 ], relies on the assumption that the transformed random variables, obtained from the marginal transformations of the original random variables, are multivariate normal distribution [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these active SHM methods, ultrasonic guided wave-based active SHM technology using a built-in piezoelectric sensor network is being widely investigated and developed for detecting cracks in various types of metallic structures. Much research has been conducted on monitoring fatigue crack growth in metallic structures [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37], including the physics-based damage index, relating sensor measurements to crack growth size [17], the interaction of Lamb wave modes at varying frequencies with a through-thickness crack of different lengths [20], Lamb wave mode decomposition using concentric ring and circular piezoelectric transducers [21], a multi-feature integration method based on a second-order multivariate regression analysis for the prediction of fatigue crack lengths using sensor measurements [24], and a Gaussian mixture model for monitoring crack propagation mixed in the time-varying influence [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%