2001
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2001.6778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Immersed-Boundary Finite-Volume Method for Simulations of Flow in Complex Geometries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

24
618
1
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 993 publications
(662 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
24
618
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the BI and the corresponding IP have been identified, a tri-linear interpolant of the following form is used to express the value of a generic variable (say ϕ) in the region between the eight nodes surrounding the image-point: (14) The eight unknown coefficients can be determined in terms of the variable values of the eight surrounding nodes (15) where (16) is the vector containing the eight unknown coefficients and (17) are the values of the variables at the eight surrounding points. Furthermore, [V ] is the Vandermonde matrix [38] corresponding to the trilinear interpolation scheme shown in Eq.…”
Section: Ghost-cell Formulation-mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once the BI and the corresponding IP have been identified, a tri-linear interpolant of the following form is used to express the value of a generic variable (say ϕ) in the region between the eight nodes surrounding the image-point: (14) The eight unknown coefficients can be determined in terms of the variable values of the eight surrounding nodes (15) where (16) is the vector containing the eight unknown coefficients and (17) are the values of the variables at the eight surrounding points. Furthermore, [V ] is the Vandermonde matrix [38] corresponding to the trilinear interpolation scheme shown in Eq.…”
Section: Ghost-cell Formulation-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include methods of Udaykumar et al [44], Ye et al [51], Fadlun et al [9], Kim et al [16], Gibou et al [12], You et al [52], Balaras [2], Marella et al [22], Ghias et al [11] and others. The key advantage of the first category of methods is that they are formulated relatively independent of the spatial discretization and therefore can be implemented into an existing Navier-Stokes solver with relative ease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former methods are known as immersed boundary formulations and tend to smear a solid boundary across few grid nodes due to the discrete delta function formulation they employ to introduce the effect of the boundary on the equations of motion [2]. The latter class of methods, on the other hand, treats solid boundaries as sharp interfaces utilizing either Cartesian, cut-cell formulations [3,4] or hybrid Cartesian/Immersed Boundary (HCIB) approaches (see [5,6,1,7] among others)-the reader is referred to [8,9] for more detailed discussion of this class of methods. Regardless on whether a diffused or a sharp interface formulation is employed, however, all available non-boundary conforming methods solve the Navier-Stokes equations in a background coordinate-conforming mesh, such as a Cartesian (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1]) or a cylindrical (e.g. [6]) mesh. This is an inherent feature of such methods as their derivation is motivated by the need to avoid constructing a curvilinear, boundary conforming mesh, which for arbitrarily complex boundaries could be difficult if not impossible to construct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proposed a direct forcing approach such that the desired velocity distribution on the immersed boundary is satisfied explicitly. Various formulations for the direct forcing approach have been developed subsequently [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%