2016
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-6058(16)60684-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An hybrid RANS/LES model for simulation of complex turbulent flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where  is the turbulent dissipation rate, μ C denotes the eddy viscosity coefficient. According to the results of experiments (Champagne et al 1970;Tavoularis and Corrsin 1981) and the DNS (Lee et al 1990;Rogers and Moin 1987), the non-linear eddy viscosity model had been proposed by Wei et al (2016) and was applied first to investigate the pressure fluctuation characteristics of the centrifugal pump.…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Where  is the turbulent dissipation rate, μ C denotes the eddy viscosity coefficient. According to the results of experiments (Champagne et al 1970;Tavoularis and Corrsin 1981) and the DNS (Lee et al 1990;Rogers and Moin 1987), the non-linear eddy viscosity model had been proposed by Wei et al (2016) and was applied first to investigate the pressure fluctuation characteristics of the centrifugal pump.…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The URANS_SSTNL model diminishes deviation, but the DDES_NL model offers the smallest discrepancy. Figure 3 shows the comparison of the calculated turbulent structures and the experimental (Htun 2004;Wei et al 2016) (The second invariant of velocity gradient tensor is used to describe (Q-criterion(Q = S 2 − Ω 2 , S being the strain rate and Ω the vorticity))), Htun M studied the influence of the size and direction of the top angle and the angle of attack on the structure of the flow through the triangular cylinder in a wind tunnel and conducted an experimental study; colored according to the velocity), it is apparent that all models can capture the periodic vortex shedding, the conventional URANS method only obtains the vortex structure of a single mode, while the DDES_NL method exhibits the ability to automatically detect the separation zone and switch to the LES mode for solving in the separation zone, thus capturing a richer large-scale turbulence structure.…”
Section: Front and Backmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the turbulence model was replaced as LES with the Smargorinsky-Lily mode, and the unsteady force and flow field were simulated [27,28,29]. In all the simulations which were run by using the Pressure-Based solver [30,31], the SIMPLEC algorithm was applied for Pressure-Velocity Coupling, with Least Squares Cell Based for gradient discretization, with PRESTO for pressure discretization, and with Bounded Central Differencing for momentum discretization. Sliding mesh technique was applied to the rotation motion simulation.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the DES method has great advantages: it can be applied at high Reynolds numbers, and it is suitable to solve geometry-dependent, unsteady three-dimensional turbulent motions, similar to the large eddy simulation (LES) model. The model combines the advantages of the RANS (for the near-wall regions) and LES (used in the free-stream) models; consequently, it has the potential to offer more accuracy than RANS at less cost than LES [33].…”
Section: Analysis Turbulence Model Guide Vanes' State Iterations/timementioning
confidence: 99%