2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An FPGA-based platform for accelerated offline spike sorting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the spike sorting approach simulated here, the simplicity of the on-chip calculations indicates that the decrease in power consumption due to data reduction overcomes the power needs to perform those calculations. Based on the power requirements reported in low-power neural interfaces(Lopez et al, 2012, Gibson et al, 2013, Karkare et al, 2013, Wattanapanitch and Sarpeshkar., 2011, Rush and Troyk., 2012), we can estimate the power consumption of this hypothetical chip and assess its feasibility. Assuming an analog front-end (AFE) performing amplification, filtering, and ADC at 7 kHz and 10-bit resolution we estimate a spending of approximately 10 μW per channel only for this step (Wattanapanitch and Sarpeshkar., 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of the spike sorting approach simulated here, the simplicity of the on-chip calculations indicates that the decrease in power consumption due to data reduction overcomes the power needs to perform those calculations. Based on the power requirements reported in low-power neural interfaces(Lopez et al, 2012, Gibson et al, 2013, Karkare et al, 2013, Wattanapanitch and Sarpeshkar., 2011, Rush and Troyk., 2012), we can estimate the power consumption of this hypothetical chip and assess its feasibility. Assuming an analog front-end (AFE) performing amplification, filtering, and ADC at 7 kHz and 10-bit resolution we estimate a spending of approximately 10 μW per channel only for this step (Wattanapanitch and Sarpeshkar., 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous attempts to study the effect of different hardware compromises analysed the impact of dimensionality reduction (i.e. number of coefficients) for spike sorting (Gibson et al, 2013, Gibson et al, 2010), and the number of errors in a wireless protocol versus packet length (Aghagolzadeh and Oweiss., 2011). In line, Zhang and collaborators studied how sampling rate and resolution affect the reconstruction error after wireless data transmission (Zhang et al, 2012), whereas Thorbergsson and colleagues studied the effect of these parameters on offline processing outside the body (Thorbergsson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrating a spike sorting algorithm into an IC to reduce system size was first demonstrated by Karkare et al in which a Euclidian distance based sorting algorithm was used [35,36]. Later, Gibson et al developed an FPGA system in which the spike sorting algorithm used by Rutishauser was implemented, increasing the sorting speed 25 fold, with a worst-case latency of 11 ms [34,37]. Park et al [38] designed a real-time spike sorting system based on Rutishauser with the abilities of online training and classification, their work also optimized memory usage during the template training phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A drawback of some FPGA circuits is that they may utilize high area resources and/or dissipate high power. The FPGA systems are then mainly adopted only for offline spike sorting systems [ 8 ]. An alternative to the FPGA for hardware implementation is based on the application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%