2017 Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium - Fall (PIERS - FALL) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/piers-fall.2017.8293294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An FPGA based 1.6 GHz cross-correlator for synthetic aperture interferometric radiometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can safely be assumed that this correlator can perform well at 250 MHz resulting in a collective capacity of 2 GHz from all 8 lanes. This is where our proposed design partition technique for correlator implementation proved fruitful, as our first design without this partition could only run at 200 MHz giving a total of 1.6 GHz throughput as described in [ 26 ]. Device view shows that the correlation and first stage integration modules, running at higher frequency, were implemented using resources with minimum physical separation while the modules containing second stage of integration were implemented using device resources scattered over comparatively large area owing to the fixed location of BRAM and DSP slices.…”
Section: Design Verification and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can safely be assumed that this correlator can perform well at 250 MHz resulting in a collective capacity of 2 GHz from all 8 lanes. This is where our proposed design partition technique for correlator implementation proved fruitful, as our first design without this partition could only run at 200 MHz giving a total of 1.6 GHz throughput as described in [ 26 ]. Device view shows that the correlation and first stage integration modules, running at higher frequency, were implemented using resources with minimum physical separation while the modules containing second stage of integration were implemented using device resources scattered over comparatively large area owing to the fixed location of BRAM and DSP slices.…”
Section: Design Verification and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference from [ 7 , 19 ] is that they implemented the first stage as a pre-scaler which is not a part of readout values, while we have implemented it as two stage accumulation. The idea of design partition in low-speed and high speed clock domains arisen from our baseline implementation [ 26 ] where all the correlation and accumulation operations are carried out on the same, high-speed clock. It was observed that all the critical paths existed between the first stage integrator and the second stage, where signals from 256 first stage integrators were being accumulated by a pair of an adder and a DPRAM.…”
Section: Correlation System Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hardware correlators have been developed using field-programmable gate array technology to address the need. For example, multi-channel FPGA cross-correlators were used in aperture synthesis imaging systems [15][16][17]. The FPGA correlator alleviated the computational load in realtime ultrasound sensor systems using the complementary ultrasound pulse sequences for the enhancement of the signal-to-noise ratio [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies show that the back-end processing system is one of the largest contributors in the power consumption of a radiometer mounted on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) [6] [7][8] [9]. Most of these works used microprocessors and FPGAs to process the radiometric data, or data-loggers to store the raw data in flight and process the data on ground after the flight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these works used microprocessors and FPGAs to process the radiometric data, or data-loggers to store the raw data in flight and process the data on ground after the flight. For example, in [7] the authors use an FPGA to process the radiometric data and the power consumption was higher than 8 W. These works do not take into consideration how the power consumption of the back-end processing system impacts the performance, flight time, battery capacity, weight, and size of the radiometer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%