2015 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/aim.2015.7222669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extended inertia and eigenfrequency emulation for full-scale wind turbine nacelle test benches

Abstract: The main causes of wind turbines failures are mechanical and electrical drive train components [1]. Since isolated simulation studies seem not to sufficiently reproduce load situations in the fully assembled and operated system, wind industry pays more and more attention to wind turbine System Test Benches. They allow for detailed load analysis within the complete drive train system and also for controller tests. For both investigations drive train dynamics of the wind turbine generator (WTG) are of high relev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar approach for MHiL is introduced in [10], but restricted to simulation results for validation. An emulation of rotor inertia and related eigenfrequencies was first introduced in [11], where a state feedback controller shifts the eigenfrequencies of the test bench to the desired locations in the complex eigenvalue plane. The authors of [12] use model-based control, namely an internal model control, and suggest a two-step procedure to design the HiL control algorithm, which also allows eigenfrequency emulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar approach for MHiL is introduced in [10], but restricted to simulation results for validation. An emulation of rotor inertia and related eigenfrequencies was first introduced in [11], where a state feedback controller shifts the eigenfrequencies of the test bench to the desired locations in the complex eigenvalue plane. The authors of [12] use model-based control, namely an internal model control, and suggest a two-step procedure to design the HiL control algorithm, which also allows eigenfrequency emulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when mounted on a test bench, the test article is missing the rotor (hub and blades) and the tower which significantly alters its boundary conditions thereby changing the dynamic characteristics of the drivetrain leading to responses that are different from field testing. Several efforts have been made to address these differences and develop control techniques to emulate the missing inertia and replicate eigenfrequencies such that field testing can be better reproduced on a test bench [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field, the drive train of a WT oscillates in its eigenfrequencies due to the flexible rotor and turbulent inflow. A 3-mass oscillator was shown to sufficiently model the first two rotational eigenfrequencies and thus the drive train of a WT (Jassmann et al (2015)). Similarly, modeling the drive train of the DUT on a STB is enabled by a 3-mass oscillator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ing. Extensions to the IE method allow eigenfrequency emulation and are based on pole placement for state feedback control (Jassmann et al (2015)) or a WT reference model (Neshati et al (2016b), Jassmann 2018 Throughout the comparison of different HiL control approaches, the same HiL system architecture shown in Fig. 1 is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%