1994
DOI: 10.1016/1069-0115(94)90032-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extended fuzzy linguistic approach to generalize boolean information retrieval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and c i , for example, as b ϭ round~26b Ϫ a6/T !. We should point out that whereas the traditional threshold matching function are always nondecreasing, 14 g is nondecreasing on the right of the midterm and decreasing on the left of the midterm in order to be consistent with the meaning of the symmetrical threshold semantics. 2!…”
Section: Evaluation Subsystemmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…and c i , for example, as b ϭ round~26b Ϫ a6/T !. We should point out that whereas the traditional threshold matching function are always nondecreasing, 14 g is nondecreasing on the right of the midterm and decreasing on the left of the midterm in order to be consistent with the meaning of the symmetrical threshold semantics. 2!…”
Section: Evaluation Subsystemmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…According to the symmetrical threshold semantics the evaluation subsystem assumes that users may search for documents with a minimally acceptable presence of one term in their representations~as happens in the classical interpretation 14 In the following subsection, we try to overcome these problems by defining a new threshold matching function.…”
Section: Problems Of the Symmetrical Threshold Semantics Modeled By Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 82 Donald H. Kraft, Gloria Bordogna and Gabriella Pasi redefine the previous fuzzy linguistic IRS 81 by introducing a new threshold semantics in a linguistic context which was obtained by combination of both, the ideal semantics 58 and threshold semantics 60 .…”
Section: Fuzzy Linguistic Irss Based On Classical Flmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty (20) queries were used in the evaluation, and some examples of the queries used are given in Table 2. In order to evaluate the performance of our proposed fuzzy semantic information retrieval model, a comparison of results was accomplished with respect to the fuzzy IR algorithm developed by Kraft et al (1994) and the boolean IR system, using the standard recall and precision evaluations by computing the precision and recall at various cut-off points, where the precision is determined at various recall levels. The equations describing the two measures are given in Equations (3) and (4).…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%