PsycEXTRA Dataset 1962
DOI: 10.1037/e405212005-007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exploratory Analysis of Space Perception in Congenitally Blind and Sighted Individuals (Summary of doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1960)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…See Hunt (1972), Newman (1973) and McGee and Thomas (1986) for a thorough discussion of the development of strategic group research. Miles and Snow's (1978) typology also received significant attention in the literature but was not as widely cited as Porter's approach.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Hunt (1972), Newman (1973) and McGee and Thomas (1986) for a thorough discussion of the development of strategic group research. Miles and Snow's (1978) typology also received significant attention in the literature but was not as widely cited as Porter's approach.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variety of work experience also had a signi®cant direct relationship with CC r À0X16, p`0X05 suggesting that a modi®cation of the model might be needed. To better understand the sequence of these variables, the portion of the model identifying the relationships with script tracks was subjected to a path analysis (Hunter and Hamilton, 1986) as proposed. The model was then modi®ed to represent a variety of work experience as a direct antecedent of CC rather than as in¯uencing CC indirectly through script tracks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were analyzed with interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) (Smith & Osborn, 2003), a qualitative analytic approach which seeks to explain how participants understand their social world. IPA aims for a detailed analysis of each participant's lived experience rather than global insights; furthermore, IPA does not argue for the bracketing of assumptions but recognizes the researcher as part of the data (Wagner, 2016). In IPA, researchers take the perspective of participants and understand the meaning of their experiences through their unique worldview.…”
Section: Measures and Interview Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%