2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An explorative study of the beliefs of staff of psychogeriatric nursing homes regarding the use of dynamic lighting systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further searches found that a Cochrane Review was undertaken in 2014 (Forbes et al, 2014). Studies that cited the Cochrane Review were subsequently searched and one met the inclusion criteria (van Wezel et al, 2016). The data was not extracted from two studies as they were assessed within the Cochrane Review (Ancoli-Isreal et al, 2003; Thorpe et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further searches found that a Cochrane Review was undertaken in 2014 (Forbes et al, 2014). Studies that cited the Cochrane Review were subsequently searched and one met the inclusion criteria (van Wezel et al, 2016). The data was not extracted from two studies as they were assessed within the Cochrane Review (Ancoli-Isreal et al, 2003; Thorpe et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two retrieved studies explored the opinions of professional caregivers of dynamic lighting systems (Aarts et al, 2014; van Wezel et al, 2016). In one study, the DLS were purchased to improve residents well-being and their sleep/wake rhythm (Aarts et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise some staff did not want a role in maintaining the system as they did not see this as their responsibility. Carers were also concerned about the system's influence on their own circadian rhythms [62] and the…”
Section: Underinvestment In Social Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, the perspectives of all stakeholders should be covered. Individuals differ in their values and motives with regard to health, care, their desired living environment, and technologies [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Therefore, the need for new ways of designing technology and the environment are needed, for instance, through the co-design and participatory approaches in research, while also considering and including the least-voiced in our societies, such as persons living with dementia or a physical limitation [37,[45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%