2014
DOI: 10.1002/sres.2296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exploration of the Problem of Plagiarism with the Cognitive Mapping Technique

Abstract: Plagiarism is a hot topic in the education sector. Mainly focusing on the business education sector, the paper reviews the literature on plagiarism and exposes the soft complexity underlining the plagiarism problem. The complexity of the plagiarism theme is further depicted using the cognitive mapping technique, which can be considered as an attempt to enhance the multiperspective, systems-based cognitive filter in the multiperspective, systems-based research. Finally, the paper recommends the employment of sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It had become clear that this "punitive" rather than "proactive" approach, in Sarah Elaine Eaton et al's words (2017, p. 29-30), was not the only option. We had opportunities to move from the default model of blaming and shaming that Ho (2015), Mulholland (2020) and others argue characterizes higher education's AI approach, with its dominant "judicio-moral paradigm" (Howard, 1992, p. 235), and see AI as a skill and way of knowing that-like all other concepts we think of as foundational to learning in our courses-we can and need to teach, explicitly, and with recognition of its complexity. With this new insight, and in collaboration with a similarly-minded Associate Dean Academic, I initiated a pilot project in 2016 that brought together eight full-time faculty members (both both tenure-track and lecturers, colleagues with multi-year contracts) who were teaching in Arts' First-Year Programs (FYP) to think with me about what we could do differently in our courses so that our students not only knew how to meet the expectations of academic integrity (itself a major learning curve), but also why they should care to do so, beyond just avoiding getting caught for violating it.…”
Section: Starting Our "Hearts": Project Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It had become clear that this "punitive" rather than "proactive" approach, in Sarah Elaine Eaton et al's words (2017, p. 29-30), was not the only option. We had opportunities to move from the default model of blaming and shaming that Ho (2015), Mulholland (2020) and others argue characterizes higher education's AI approach, with its dominant "judicio-moral paradigm" (Howard, 1992, p. 235), and see AI as a skill and way of knowing that-like all other concepts we think of as foundational to learning in our courses-we can and need to teach, explicitly, and with recognition of its complexity. With this new insight, and in collaboration with a similarly-minded Associate Dean Academic, I initiated a pilot project in 2016 that brought together eight full-time faculty members (both both tenure-track and lecturers, colleagues with multi-year contracts) who were teaching in Arts' First-Year Programs (FYP) to think with me about what we could do differently in our courses so that our students not only knew how to meet the expectations of academic integrity (itself a major learning curve), but also why they should care to do so, beyond just avoiding getting caught for violating it.…”
Section: Starting Our "Hearts": Project Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a student's case, this gain would translate into better grades (Muthanna, 2016). Numerous authors have examined the types of plagiarism (Walker, 1998;Curtis and Vardanega, 2016), its causes (Rettinger and Kramer, 2009;Horbach and Halffman, 2019), or its consequences (Ho, 2015;Kashian et al, 2015). Some studies look at the issue from the students' perspectives (Childers and Bruton, 2016;Cronan et al, 2018), others from the professors' (Thomas and De Bruin, 2012;Bruton and Childers, 2016).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework Academic Integrity and Plagiarismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(The creative holism topic is explained in Jackson, 's book on contemporary systems thinking.) Regarding the topic of employing cognitive mapping to synthesize academic notions and more context‐specific ideas to gain a complicated understanding of a topic, for example, management topic, and/or associated situation (re: ALRA step 4), readers are also referred to two dated works from the writer as illustrative: Ho and Jackson () and Ho ().…”
Section: The Underlying Systems Thinking Of the Agile Literature Revimentioning
confidence: 99%