2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exploration of the effects of prefabricated and customized insoles on lower limb kinetics and kinematics during walking, stepping up and down tasks: A time series analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first metatarsal region's contact area was increased and the peak pressure and time-pressure integral of the fist metatarsal [22]. Lourenço et al (2022) observed the effects of prefabricated and customized insoles on walking, stepping up and stepping down tasks in individuals with excessive foot pronation. The kinetic data were recorded using three synchronized force plates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first metatarsal region's contact area was increased and the peak pressure and time-pressure integral of the fist metatarsal [22]. Lourenço et al (2022) observed the effects of prefabricated and customized insoles on walking, stepping up and stepping down tasks in individuals with excessive foot pronation. The kinetic data were recorded using three synchronized force plates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The kinetic data were recorded using three synchronized force plates. Both insoles reduced rearfoot eversion in all tasks [23]. Zhang et al (2022) determined the effects of foot orthoses with forefoot wedge and arch-support components during running in symptomatic pronated feet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we reported numerical values for all types of foot orthotics used in the respective studies 13-16, 30-33, 38-42, 44 . We extracted data from graphs out of ve studies 15,30,31,33,43 .…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subgroup analysis showed no signi cant effect of short-term FO application in the studies that assessed foot posture using the foot print arch index 35 (1 study: SMDs=0.55, 95% CI -0.18 to 1.28, p=0.14). Signi cant effects were observed for the studies that used the FPI-6 or clinical observation [30][31][32][33] (4 studies: moderate SMDs=0.68, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.23, p=0.01, I 2 =83%) and forefoot varus 13,40 (2 studies: moderate SMDs=0.5, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.77, p=0.0002, I 2 =0%) to determine foot pronation (Fig 4 , Table 5). Five studies reported peak ankle eversion moment in Nm/kg.…”
Section: Anklementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation