The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Expert, Multidisciplinary Perspective on Best Practices in Biomarker Testing in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Abstract: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a rare and aggressive malignancy that arises from the intrahepatic biliary tree and is associated with a poor prognosis. Until recently, the treatment landscape of advanced/metastatic iCCA has been limited primarily to chemotherapy. In recent years, the advent of biomarker testing has identified actionable genetic alterations in 40%-50% of patients with iCCA, heralding an era of precision medicine for these patients. Biomarker testing using next-generation sequencing (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Irrespective of biopsy sampling method, there was strong (>86%) agreement among the panel for genomic profiling in all patients diagnosed with CCA (statement 11), performed at the time of the initial diagnosis (statement 12), and using NGS technologies (statement 13). These statements are at odds with the 2022 Italian guidelines (Associazione Italiana per lo Studio del Fegato (AISF) et al), but are broadly consistent with the ESMO guidelines (Figure 2) (Mosele et al, 2020;Vogel et al, 2023), 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2022), multidisciplinary recommendations from the US (Madoff et al, 2022), and the Italian expert guidelines from FICOG/ISS, which recommend using NGS for genomic profiling of patients with advanced CCA (Pinto et al, 2021). Although the ESMO guidelines do not specifically advocate genomic profiling in every patient diagnosed with CCA, they do recommend genomic profiling prior to any nonsurgical treatment, and particularly for patients with advanced disease prior to systemic treatment (Vogel et al, 2023).…”
Section: Diagnosis and Role Of Genetic Alterationsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Irrespective of biopsy sampling method, there was strong (>86%) agreement among the panel for genomic profiling in all patients diagnosed with CCA (statement 11), performed at the time of the initial diagnosis (statement 12), and using NGS technologies (statement 13). These statements are at odds with the 2022 Italian guidelines (Associazione Italiana per lo Studio del Fegato (AISF) et al), but are broadly consistent with the ESMO guidelines (Figure 2) (Mosele et al, 2020;Vogel et al, 2023), 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2022), multidisciplinary recommendations from the US (Madoff et al, 2022), and the Italian expert guidelines from FICOG/ISS, which recommend using NGS for genomic profiling of patients with advanced CCA (Pinto et al, 2021). Although the ESMO guidelines do not specifically advocate genomic profiling in every patient diagnosed with CCA, they do recommend genomic profiling prior to any nonsurgical treatment, and particularly for patients with advanced disease prior to systemic treatment (Vogel et al, 2023).…”
Section: Diagnosis and Role Of Genetic Alterationsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…iCCA is associated with a poor prognosis and a high mortality rate due to its insidious and aggressive nature, with many patients presenting with locally advanced disease and even metastases, thus limiting therapeutic options [17,18]. Surgical margin-negative resection is considered the only definite treatment, but only about 20% of cases are candidates for surgical treatment [3,19] because of an advanced stage at the time of diagnosis, comorbidities or advanced age [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk factors associated with iCCA development are cirrhosis, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), hepatolithiasis, hepatobiliary flukes, biliary cirrhosis, gallstones, choledochal cysts, Caroli’s disease, chronic infection by Salmonella typhi or Helicobacter bilis, metabolic syndrome, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and obesity [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]; however, the majority of iCCA cases are not associated with any risk factors [ 16 ]. iCCA is associated with a poor prognosis and a high mortality rate due to its insidious and aggressive nature, with many patients presenting with locally advanced disease and even metastases, thus limiting therapeutic options [ 17 , 18 ]. Surgical margin-negative resection is considered the only definite treatment, but only about 20% of cases are candidates for surgical treatment [ 3 , 19 ] because of an advanced stage at the time of diagnosis, comorbidities or advanced age [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%