2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental study on the within-member variability of in situ concrete strength in RC building structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in previous studies [18][19], estimating the CoV fc |N using a small sample of results from concrete core tests may lead to estimates that do not reflect the real variability of the concrete strength. This fact is even more relevant due to the high value of the concrete strength CoV fc |N that is usually found in existing buildings [20][21][22][23], often exceeding a value of 0.20 [24]. A methodology improving the accuracy of the estimate of CoV fc |N by using rebound hammer tests was proposed in [18].…”
Section: Comparison Between the Ec8/3 Cf Values And The Proposed Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in previous studies [18][19], estimating the CoV fc |N using a small sample of results from concrete core tests may lead to estimates that do not reflect the real variability of the concrete strength. This fact is even more relevant due to the high value of the concrete strength CoV fc |N that is usually found in existing buildings [20][21][22][23], often exceeding a value of 0.20 [24]. A methodology improving the accuracy of the estimate of CoV fc |N by using rebound hammer tests was proposed in [18].…”
Section: Comparison Between the Ec8/3 Cf Values And The Proposed Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the range of values reported in the literature (e.g. see [20][21][22][23][24]), a CoV fc |N of 0.30 can be considered to be a conservative estimate of the concrete strength variability. According to For the case of reinforcing steel, common values for the CoV|N of the rebar yield strength are generally less than 0.10.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Ec8/3 Cf Values And The Proposed Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic between-member (3) variability and batch-to-batch variability (4) were assumed to be dominant when compared with the other two components [3], despite their known effects (e.g. see [9,14,16]). This fact allows for the definition of a concrete strength discretization criterion where it is assumed that each structural member of the building is represented by a single concrete strength value.…”
Section: Discretizing the Concrete Strength And Disaggregating Its Vamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variations of the concrete strength can also be expected within each structural member due to the previously mentioned factors. Moreover, a recent study [9] also described cracking, damage and the selection of the testing positions within the length of a structural element as sources of potential variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-situ non-destructive testing (NDT) of concrete structures may target strength estimation of structural concrete either to complete destructive testing or in the absence of drilled cores for laboratory testing [17][18][19][20]. In-situ assessment is frequently initiated by corrosion problems [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%