2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10608-019-10026-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental Study on the Induction of an Eating Disorder-Specific Interpretation Bias in Healthy Individuals: Testing the Interpretation Modification Paradigm for Eating Disorders (IMP-ED)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cronbach's α for the PACS was .841. This scale was included in the evaluation because the Cyberball task does not include a physical comparison measure, but the literature has shown that it has an important mediation role in social rejection (Korn et al, ; Rieger et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cronbach's α for the PACS was .841. This scale was included in the evaluation because the Cyberball task does not include a physical comparison measure, but the literature has shown that it has an important mediation role in social rejection (Korn et al, ; Rieger et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social rejection has already showed a trigger effect for eating, shape, and weight concerns in healthy individuals, giving evidences of a linkage between interpersonal dysfunction and ED symptoms (Rieger et al, ). Korn, Dietel, and Hartmann () used the Cyberball task as a measure of the effect of an interpretation modification paradigm in people with ED, showing that cognitive bias modification can have an effect on social interaction and physical comparison in nonclinical samples. Moreover, Cardi et al () used the Cyberball paradigm to evaluate the effect of an interpretation bias training for social rejection; however, they did not evaluate the paradigm per se.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, body image-related negative interpretation bias was positively associated with eating disorder symptom severity and body dissatisfaction in both patients and healthy women [9]. More recently, interpretation bias has also been investigated as a potential mechanism in the development of eating disorders: After a training that reinforced negative interpretations, healthy women showed increased body dissatisfaction and reduced appearance-related self-esteem [17]. This is noteworthy as both high body dissatisfaction and low appearance-related self-esteem represent considerable risk factors for eating disorder development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, prior studies have demonstrated that negative appearance‐related interpretation bias is associated with BD (Rodgers & DuBois, 2016) and malleable via brief, computerized interpretation retraining programs (Cognitive Bias Modification for Interpretation, CBM‐I; e.g., MacLeod, 2012). CBM‐I‐based induction of appearance‐related interpretation bias in mentally healthy individuals has been shown to produce congruent changes in bias patterns and, inconsistently, reactivity to BDD‐ and ED‐relevant stressors (Dietel et al, 2018; Korn, Dietel, & Hartmann, 2019). These findings undermine hypotheses about the maintaining role of interpretation bias and the therapeutic relevance of CBM‐I programs for BD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%