SAE Technical Paper Series 2001
DOI: 10.4271/2001-01-3106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental Study of Springback for Dual Phase Steel and Conventional High Strength Steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This property enhances more uniform deformation in the forming process and also contributes to absorb more impact energy, making them attractive for application in components designed to absorb energy by crushing [3]. However, the DP-Steel displays higher spring-back and side-wall curl than the HSLA *Corresponding author: kchung@snu.ac.kr steel due to its higher as-formed yield strength [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This property enhances more uniform deformation in the forming process and also contributes to absorb more impact energy, making them attractive for application in components designed to absorb energy by crushing [3]. However, the DP-Steel displays higher spring-back and side-wall curl than the HSLA *Corresponding author: kchung@snu.ac.kr steel due to its higher as-formed yield strength [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High work hardening is also an important feature of the dual phase steel. Recently an experiment made by Konieczny [10] shows that the forming limit of two phase steel can also be calculated through ASM formula with n values and the thickness of material be given. The forming region depends on the material forming limit and its strain.…”
Section: Experimental Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have analyzed and investigated the effect of parameters on the springback effect on various grades of AHSS [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The amount of springback is influenced by various process parameters, such as gap between punch and die, material thickness [4], forming force, tool radius [5][6], ratio between die radius and thickness [7], blank holder force [8], and material properties including sheet anisotropy, Young's modulus, strength coefficient, and strain hardening exponent [9]. Nowadays, the prediction of such forming defects using numerical simulation becomes a critical step and popular in modern industry, which allow reduction of traditional costly trial-and-error experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%