2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf03027256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of anisotropic yielding, bauschinger and transient behavior of automotive dual-phase steel sheets

Abstract: In order to present better prediction capability in computational analysis, mechanical properties of the dualphase high strength steel have been characterized especially for anisotropy as well as the Bauschinger and transient behavior. As for the anisotropy, the non-quadratic anisotropic yield function Yld2000-2d has been utilized and its material parameters have been obtained using the uni-axial tension tests as well as the hydraulic bulge test. To measure the hardening behavior including the Bauschinger and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18][19] Despite the longstanding investigations into the effective grain size of acicular ferritic, bainitic, martensitic, or multiphase steels, there still remain many controversies. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] These studies on the correlation between microstructure and low-temperature toughness have been mostly limited to the ductile-brittle transition temperature and the absorbed energy obtained from Charpy impact tests, and the studies into the effects of microstructure and effective grain size, steel properties, and test conditions on DWTT properties are rarely touched. In the present study, thus, pipeline steels having various microstructures were fabricated by varying alloying elements and rolling conditions, and the Charpy impact test and DWTT were conducted on them in order to evaluate toughness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[16][17][18][19] Despite the longstanding investigations into the effective grain size of acicular ferritic, bainitic, martensitic, or multiphase steels, there still remain many controversies. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] These studies on the correlation between microstructure and low-temperature toughness have been mostly limited to the ductile-brittle transition temperature and the absorbed energy obtained from Charpy impact tests, and the studies into the effects of microstructure and effective grain size, steel properties, and test conditions on DWTT properties are rarely touched. In the present study, thus, pipeline steels having various microstructures were fabricated by varying alloying elements and rolling conditions, and the Charpy impact test and DWTT were conducted on them in order to evaluate toughness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] The toughness is largely affected by microstructural factors, while the transition temperature is associated with an overall domain widely known as an effective grain size. [13,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] In the present study, high-strength, high-toughness X70 pipeline steel specimens were fabricated by varying alloying elements and rolling conditions. Charpy impact test and pressed notch DWTT were conducted on them in order to investigate effects of microstructure on fracture toughness and transition temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material properties of DP-steel have been previously measured as summarized in the work by Kim et al [16]. The experimental procedures and material properties of DP-steel are briefly summarized here.…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since thin sheets are prone to buckle under compression, compression tests have been performed by providing guides along the both sides of the sheet specimen on which clamping forces are applied [16]. For the Bauschinger and transient behavior during unloading, uni-axial tension/ compression (pre-tensile straining before compression) tests have been performed, while hardening behavior has been measured using uni-axial tension tests.…”
Section: Hardening Behavior With Unloadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4(a)), such crossover was not observed up to the true strain of 1.2, but was expected to occur with further increasing of strain. The flow stress crossover or convergence before and after drawing can be explained in terms of the two combined effects of pre-straining by drawing and the Bauschinger effect 14,15) during compression. As depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Compression Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%