1986
DOI: 10.1080/03091928608245897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental investigation of convection in a rotating sphere subject to time varying thermal boundary conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Guervilly, Cardin & Schaeffer (2019) examined the convective length scales in a rotating sphere using both quasi-geostrophic and fully three-dimensional methods in the regime of very low Ekman number and small Prandtl number, albeit with a weak thermal forcing (around the onset of convection). Convection was studied experimentally in the full sphere by Chamberlain & Carrigan (1986) using centrifugal gravity, though practical considerations precluded the exploration of very supercritical Rayleigh numbers: in that study, Ra 2.5Ra c . The highly supercritical regime of convection in a whole sphere is of great relevance to the dynamics of the Earth's core prior to inner core nucleation and to some fully convective stars, yet the problem remains largely unexplored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Guervilly, Cardin & Schaeffer (2019) examined the convective length scales in a rotating sphere using both quasi-geostrophic and fully three-dimensional methods in the regime of very low Ekman number and small Prandtl number, albeit with a weak thermal forcing (around the onset of convection). Convection was studied experimentally in the full sphere by Chamberlain & Carrigan (1986) using centrifugal gravity, though practical considerations precluded the exploration of very supercritical Rayleigh numbers: in that study, Ra 2.5Ra c . The highly supercritical regime of convection in a whole sphere is of great relevance to the dynamics of the Earth's core prior to inner core nucleation and to some fully convective stars, yet the problem remains largely unexplored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as our investigations of the cases with stress-free boundaries, we also consider the solutions in the case of rigid boundaries at which we apply a no-slip boundary condition. This is, of course, the true situation in the Earth's context as well as for experiments (Busse & Carrigan 1976;Carrigan & Busse 1983;Chamberlain & Carrigan 1986;Hart, Glatzmaier & Toomre 1986;Cordero & Busse 1992). In that case, an Ekman layer forms at the boundary outside which the mainstream solution on the short E 1/3 azimuthal length scale is influenced at O(E 1/6 ) by Ekman-layer suction, as noted by Zhang & Jones (1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The former 'internal heating' case is motivated by the situation for a complete sphere (r i = 0) for which the uniform heat source distribution leads to the temperature gradient −β r, where β ≡ 2(T i − T o )/r 2 o (see also Chamberlain & Carrigan 1986). In the latter 'differential heating' case, there are no internal heat sources and the temperature gradient is simply maintained by the temperature difference between the inner and outer boundaries (see, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in liquid metals where P 1 the thermal Ekman number E κ = E/P becomes the relevant control parameter. The description of the convective motions as barotropic thermal Rossby waves has been validated in water experiments, both at low forcings (Busse & Carrigan 1976;Carrigan & Busse 1983 for the onset of convection with E > 1.7 × 10 −5 , Chamberlain & Carrigan 1986;Cordero & Busse 1992) and strong forcings (Cardin & Olson 1992 where E > 4 × 10 −6 and R up to 50 times critical), R = γ α T d 4 /κν being the Rayleigh number with γ the gravity gradient, α the thermal expansion coefficient of the fluid and T the temperature difference between the inner and the outer boundaries. Cardin & Olson (1994) -see also Sumita & Olson (2000 who used a hemispherical shell -concentrated on the evolution of the heat flux as convection develops from onset by comparing experiments performed in water with quasi-geostrophic numerical simulations.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%