2004
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112003007316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The onset of thermal convection in rotating spherical shells

Abstract: The correct asymptotic theory for the linear onset of instability of a Boussinesq fluid rotating rapidly in a self-gravitating sphere containing a uniform distribution of heat sources was given recently by Jones et al. (2000). Their analysis confirmed the established picture that instability at small Ekman number $E$ is characterized by quasi-geostrophic thermal Rossby waves, which vary slowly in the axial direction on the scale of the sphere radius $r_o$ and have short azimuthal length scale $O(E^{1/3}r_o)$. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
221
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
17
221
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If this is true, a three dimensional model could be used to determine the Stewartson layer, axisymmetric stationary basic state flow, for very low Ekman numbers Dormy et al (1998);Hollerbach (2003) and the onset of Rossby wave instability, and its critical parameters, may be computed using a QG model. In any case, it is difficult to imagine that this approach will solve the discrepancy between the flat cylindrical experiments of Früh & Read (1999) and Niino & Misawa (1984) At very low Ekman numbers E < 10 −6 , we report an interesting radial structure, comparable to the one exhibited in the thermal instability case by Dormy et al (2004). However, if the global structure of the flow is quite similar to the spiraling thermal convection flow in a rapidly rotating spherical shell, the radial extension of the instability is surprisingly independent of the Ekman number.…”
Section: Spherical Shell Geometrymentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If this is true, a three dimensional model could be used to determine the Stewartson layer, axisymmetric stationary basic state flow, for very low Ekman numbers Dormy et al (1998);Hollerbach (2003) and the onset of Rossby wave instability, and its critical parameters, may be computed using a QG model. In any case, it is difficult to imagine that this approach will solve the discrepancy between the flat cylindrical experiments of Früh & Read (1999) and Niino & Misawa (1984) At very low Ekman numbers E < 10 −6 , we report an interesting radial structure, comparable to the one exhibited in the thermal instability case by Dormy et al (2004). However, if the global structure of the flow is quite similar to the spiraling thermal convection flow in a rapidly rotating spherical shell, the radial extension of the instability is surprisingly independent of the Ekman number.…”
Section: Spherical Shell Geometrymentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In the flat case (figure 3c), the radial extent of the shear instability decreases as E 1/4 , following the width of the Stewartson layer. In the thermal convective case, the critical thermal Rossby wave is localised in a radial domain of width E 1/6 (Yano 1992;Jones et al 2000;Dormy et al 2004). On the contrary, the prograde Stewartson instabilities spread all the way to the outer equator.…”
Section: Numerical Calculations Of the Stewartson Instabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Boussinesq approximation, convection becomes possible above a critical Rayleigh number, which scales with rotation rate as Ra c ∝ Ω 4/3 0 (e.g., Chandrasekhar 1961;Dormy et al 2004). Anelastic systems have a similar constraint on the minimum Rayleigh number that is necessary for the flows to be convective Jones et al 2009).…”
Section: Scaling Diffusion With Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of such convective modes that can fit within the circumference of the star increases with rotation rate and thus the Taylor number Dormy et al 2004;Jones et al 2009). This means that at a given radius these modes will have less longitudinal extent as exhibited in panels (a), (e), and (i) of Figure 3.…”
Section: Case A: 12 M Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%